These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22100625)

  • 1. Optimizing reliability and sensitivity of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for establishing point tactile thresholds.
    Tracey EH; Greene AJ; Doty RL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(4):982-6. PubMed ID: 22100625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive procedure for routine measurement of light-touch sensitivity threshold.
    Berquin AD; Lijesevic V; Blond S; Plaghki L
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Sep; 42(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 20665509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing.
    Villarroel MF; Orsini MB; Lima RC; Antunes CM
    Lepr Rev; 2007 Jun; 78(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17824480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of the Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments to measure coetaneous sensibility in the feet of healthy subjects.
    Collins S; Visscher P; De Vet HC; Zuurmond WW; Perez RS
    Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(24):2019-27. PubMed ID: 20441434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a relationship between light touch-pressure sensation and functional hand ability?
    Melchior H; Vatine JJ; Weiss PL
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 29(7):567-75. PubMed ID: 17453977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the electrical perceptual threshold and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament tests of cutaneous sensibility.
    Ellaway PH; Catley M
    Spinal Cord; 2013 Feb; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 22945746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral measurement of tactile and filament-prick pain threshold using shortened Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Komiyama O; Gracely RH; Kawara M; Laat AD
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18180631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nasal tactile sensitivity in allergic rhinitis.
    Salzano FA; Mora R; Penco S; Traverso D; Gaggero G; Salzano G; Guastini L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):640-4. PubMed ID: 21395473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensory evaluation of the hands in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Schreuders TA; Selles RW; van Ginneken BT; Janssen WG; Stam HJ
    J Hand Ther; 2008; 21(1):28-34; quiz 35. PubMed ID: 18215749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of age-related plantar-surface insensitivity and onset age of advanced insensitivity in older adults using vibratory and touch sensation tests.
    Perry SD
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):62-7. PubMed ID: 16183200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of tactile sensitivity measured with a new digital esthesiometer (Beam Test) relative to Semmes-Weinstein monofilament analog esthesiometer.
    Sapa MC; Sagot JC; Touvenot G; Xavier F; Hidalgo Diaz JJ; Facca S; Zaré M; Liverneaux P
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2019 Sep; 38(4):242-245. PubMed ID: 31254656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple and reliable method for clinical assessment of odor thresholds.
    Lötsch J; Lange C; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2004 May; 29(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 15150144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the variation in sensory test results using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Chikai M; Ozawa E; Takahashi N; Nunokawa K; Ino S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1259-62. PubMed ID: 26736496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the semmes-weinstein monofilament 4-2-1 stepping algorithm.
    Snyder BA; Munter AD; Houston MN; Hoch JM; Hoch MC
    Muscle Nerve; 2016 Jun; 53(6):918-24. PubMed ID: 26474392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel.
    Güçlü B; Oztek C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Oct; 98(2):113-30. PubMed ID: 17597140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing a reliable protocol to measure tongue sensation.
    Boliek CA; Rieger JM; Li SY; Mohamed Z; Kickham J; Amundsen K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):433-41. PubMed ID: 17518978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial and temporal assessment of orofacial somatosensory sensitivity: a methodological study.
    Thygesen TH; Nørholt SE; Jensen J; Svensson P
    J Orofac Pain; 2007; 21(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 17312638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory function assessment. A pilot comparison study of touch pressure threshold with texture and tactile discrimination.
    King PM
    J Hand Ther; 1997; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9116804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A gap detection tactility test for sensory deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Jeng OJ; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 8586079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.