These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22100625)

  • 21. A gap detection tactility test for sensory deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Jeng OJ; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 8586079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying reliable change in tactile temporal thresholds in multiple sclerosis: test-retest reliability.
    Brown LN; Metz LM; Eliasziw M
    Mult Scler; 2006 Oct; 12(5):573-7. PubMed ID: 17086902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tactile threshold detection in leprosy patients with an electronic algometer.
    Gomes FG; Marques W; Foss NT; Santana Lde A; Frade MA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 May; 179(2):319-22. PubMed ID: 19428543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensory perception threshold measurement: an evaluation of semiobjective testing devices.
    Halar EM; Hammond MC; LaCava EC; Camann C; Ward J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Aug; 68(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 3619613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Normal values for sensory thresholds in the cervical dermatomes: a critical note on the use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Voerman VF; van Egmond J; Crul BJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9923425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensory thresholds of normal human feet.
    Jeng C; Michelson J; Mizel M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Jun; 21(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 10884110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vibrotactile thresholds of the Non-Pacinian I channel: I. Methodological issues.
    Güçlü B; Bolanowski SJ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2005; 22(1-2):49-56. PubMed ID: 16191758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: a clinimetric review.
    Auld ML; Boyd RN; Moseley GL; Johnston LM
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2011 Nov; 31(4):413-39. PubMed ID: 21599569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reference values for touch sensibility thresholds in healthy Nepalese volunteers.
    Kets CM; Van Leerdam ME; Van Brakel WH; Deville W; Bertelsmann FW
    Lepr Rev; 1996 Mar; 67(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 8820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Psychometric functions for efficient and effective psychophysical testing of sensory function.
    Vriens JP; Strijbos SA; van der Glas HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):797-804. PubMed ID: 21600735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination.
    Vriens JP; van der Glas HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1154-8. PubMed ID: 19596558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Semmes Weinstein aesthesiometer to assess touch pressure threshold in burn scars.
    Meirte J; Moortgat P; Truijen S; Maertens K; Lafaire C; De Cuyper L; Hubens G; Van Daele U
    Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1261-7. PubMed ID: 25703663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tactile and pain thresholds in patients with myofascial pain of the jaw muscles: a case-control study.
    Michelotti A; Farella M; Stellato A; Martina R; De Laat A
    J Orofac Pain; 2008; 22(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 18548843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tactile sensitivity thresholds for the radial hemi-pulp of the index: A comparison between the Semmes-Weinstein and Cochet-Bonnet tests in 25 healthy subjects.
    Grobnicu O; Vinée F; Igeta Y; Xavier F; Bourcier T; Liverneaux P
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 37(5):295-299. PubMed ID: 30078625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensory testing with monofilaments in Hansen's disease and normal control subjects.
    Birke JA; Brandsma JW; Schreuders TA; Piefer A
    Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis; 2000 Sep; 68(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 11221092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensory perception and neuroanatomical structures in normal and grafted skin of burn survivors.
    Nedelec B; Hou Q; Sohbi I; Choinière M; Beauregard G; Dykes RW
    Burns; 2005 Nov; 31(7):817-30. PubMed ID: 16199293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Duration of contact time alters cutaneous pressure threshold measurements.
    van Vliet D; Novak CB; Mackinnon SE
    Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Oct; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 8239434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics.
    Vaegan ; Rahman AM; Sanderson GF
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):547-58. PubMed ID: 18594348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.