BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22101362)

  • 1. MM/GBSA and LIE estimates of host-guest affinities: dependence on charges and solvation model.
    Genheden S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Nov; 25(11):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22101362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding.
    Sun Z; Huai Z; He Q; Liu Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):6107-6134. PubMed ID: 34818004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril.
    Nguyen CN; Young TK; Gilson MK
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(4):044101. PubMed ID: 22852591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blind prediction of SAMPL4 cucurbit[7]uril binding affinities with the mining minima method.
    Muddana HS; Yin J; Sapra NV; Fenley AT; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 24510191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
    Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supramolecular modification of ion chemistry: modulation of peptide charge state and dissociation behavior through complexation with cucurbit[n]uril (n = 5, 6) or alpha-cyclodextrin.
    Zhang H; Grabenauer M; Bowers MT; Dearden DV
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Feb; 113(8):1508-17. PubMed ID: 19191519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies.
    Mikulskis P; Cioloboc D; Andrejić M; Khare S; Brorsson J; Genheden S; Mata RA; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):375-400. PubMed ID: 24700414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
    Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conformational dependence of charges in protein simulations.
    Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):750-60. PubMed ID: 18773405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
    Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.
    Muddana HS; Fenley AT; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 24599514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An MM/3D-RISM approach for ligand binding affinities.
    Genheden S; Luchko T; Gusarov S; Kovalenko A; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Jul; 114(25):8505-16. PubMed ID: 20524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.
    Slochower DR; Henriksen NM; Wang LP; Chodera JD; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6225-6242. PubMed ID: 31603667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.
    Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.