BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22101573)

  • 1. Congruity influences memory and judgments of learning during survival processing.
    Palmore CC; Garcia AD; Bacon LP; Johnson CA; Kelemen WL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 22101573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When disfluency is--and is not--a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory.
    Yue CL; Castel AD; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 22976883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm.
    Butler AC; Kang SH; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19857018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.
    Kang SH; McDermott KB; Cohen SM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18927033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
    Blake AB; Castel AD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The survival advantage: Underlying mechanisms and extant limitations.
    Kazanas SA; Altarriba J
    Evol Psychol; 2015 May; 13(2):360-96. PubMed ID: 25947360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Griffith SE; Burns AD
    Memory; 2013; 21(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 23259675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.
    Senkova O; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):955-967. PubMed ID: 33398785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does survival context enhance memory for source? A within-subjects comparison.
    Misirlisoy M; Tanyas H; Atalay NB
    Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):780-791. PubMed ID: 30648918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival processing of faces.
    Savine AC; Scullin MK; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1359-73. PubMed ID: 21656289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test of the survival processing advantage in implicit and explicit memory tests.
    McBride DM; Thomas BJ; Zimmerman C
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):862-71. PubMed ID: 23456303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.