BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22101573)

  • 21. Judgments of Learning Reactivity on Item-Specific and Relational Processing.
    Chang M; Brainerd C
    J Intell; 2024 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 38248902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual contrast reduces the judgments of learning of small-font words and increases the judgments of learning of large-font words compared with the no-contrast conditions.
    Wan B; Zha J; Zheng X; Li H
    Psych J; 2023 Oct; 12(5):670-679. PubMed ID: 37681240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):836-847. PubMed ID: 31259565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information.
    Knoll AR; Otani H; Skeel RL; Van Horn KR
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 108(3):544-563. PubMed ID: 27620075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 23460317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working memory load eliminates the survival processing effect.
    Kroneisen M; Rummel J; Erdfelder E
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 23885926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of perceived threat in the survival processing memory advantage.
    Olds JM; Lanska M; Westerman DL
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 23786410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does the reactivity effect of judgments of learning transfer to learning of new information?
    Li B; Zhao W; Shi A; Zhong Y; Hu X; Liu M; Luo L; Yang C
    Memory; 2023 Aug; 31(7):918-930. PubMed ID: 37143213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning.
    Mueller ML; Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 23188739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?
    Gelin M; Bugaiska A; Méot A; Bonin P
    Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 26642740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Higher judgements of learning for emotional words: processing fluency or memory beliefs?
    Pierce BH; McCain JL; Stevens AR; Frank DJ
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):714-730. PubMed ID: 37021706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23244053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?
    Weinstein Y; Bugg JM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):913-9. PubMed ID: 18630198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW; Besken M
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1000-11. PubMed ID: 23661189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.