144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22103270)
1. Implications of caries diagnostic strategies for clinical management decisions.
Baelum V; Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B; Nyvad B
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 40(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 22103270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B; Nyvad B
Caries Res; 1998; 32(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 9577986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) in surveys for the detection of noncavitated occlusal dentine caries.
Rando-Meirelles MP; de Sousa Mda L
Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 21485229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters.
Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical cavitation and radiographic lesion depth in proximal surfaces in an Indian population.
Sansare K; Raghav M; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25220524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Combining Radiographs and DIAGNOdent With Visual Examination on Detection and Treatment Decisions of Noncavitated Occluso-dentinal Caries.
Alomari QD; Qudeimat MA; Khalaf ME; Al-Tarakemah Y
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 25535787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual-tactile versus radiographic caries detection agreement in caries-active adults.
Ritter AV; Ramos MD; Astorga F; Shugars DA; Bader JD
J Public Health Dent; 2013; 73(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 23772747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Caries Lesion Detection in Preschool Children.
Moro BLP; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Gimenez T; Lara JS; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2018; 52(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 29566393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography.
Newman B; Seow WK; Kazoullis S; Ford D; Holcombe T
Aust Dent J; 2009 Mar; 54(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19228129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Caries Res; 2003; 37(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 12652049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of tactile assessment in order to detect proximal cavitation of caries lesions in vitro.
Paris S; Schwendicke F; Soviero V; Meyer-Lueckel H
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jul; 23(7):2907-2912. PubMed ID: 30612243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries-detector dyes--how accurate and useful are they?
McComb D
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 66(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 10789171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporary Tooth Separation to Improve Assessment of Approximal Caries Lesions: A School-Based Study.
Nascimento MM; Ribeiro AP; Delgado AJ; Cassiano L; Caraballo M; Roulet JF; Geraldeli S; Pereira P; Ottenga ME; Dilbone DA
Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):581-588. PubMed ID: 32516382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
