These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22103270)

  • 21. Occlusal caries extension in relation to visual and radiographic diagnostic criteria: results from a microcomputed tomography study.
    Bücher K; Galler M; Seitz M; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH; Kühnisch J
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 25695643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Mariath AA; Casagrande L; de Araujo FB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):377-81. PubMed ID: 17881594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of cavitated carious lesions in approximal tooth surfaces by ultrasonic caries detector.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Calderon S; Mittleman A; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 17178503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth.
    Mendes FM; Novaes TF; Matos R; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Gimenez T; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Braga MM
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 22907166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
    Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment compared with bitewing radiography for detection of occlusal dentin caries.
    Fracaro MS; Seow WK; McAllan LH; Purdie DM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 11447949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Should cavitation in proximal surfaces be reported in cone beam computed tomography examination?
    Sansare K; Singh D; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Saxena V; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24481006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Costa AM; Yamaguti PM; De Paula LM; Bezerra AC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):249-53, 233. PubMed ID: 12613306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?
    Moriyama CM; Novaes TF; Ferreira FR; Moro BLP; Imparato JCP; Diniz MB; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3977-3986. PubMed ID: 33404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of detecting proximal caries in posterior teeth via visual inspection, digital bitewing radiography and near-infrared light transillumination.
    Künisch J; Schaefer G; Pitchika V; Garcia-Godoy F; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 31094141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variations in caries diagnoses and treatment recommendations and their impacts on the costs of oral health care.
    da Silva RP; Meneghim MC; Correr AB; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM; Mialhe EL
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Mar; 29(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22482245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of the radiographic method on treatment decisions related to dental caries in primary molars: a before-after study.
    Pontes LRA; Novaes TF; Lara JS; Moro BLP; Gimenez T; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4075-4081. PubMed ID: 30778687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of three methods for detection of carious lesions in proximal surfaces versus direct visual examination after tooth separation.
    Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Pardi V; de Castro Meneghim M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 28(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 14604144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of high-powered magnification to detect occlusal caries in primary teeth.
    Mendes FM; Ganzerla E; Nunes AF; Puig AV; Imparato JC
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 16555652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproducibility and diagnostic outcomes of two visual-tactile criteria used by dentists to assess caries lesion activity: a cross-over study.
    Tikhonova SM; Feine JS; Pustavoitava NN; Allison PJ
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 24335157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of diagnodent in detection of occlusal caries in children.
    Olmez A; Tuna D; Oznurhan F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 30(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 16937852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is an appropriate caries diagnosis?
    Baelum V
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):65-79. PubMed ID: 20141362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars.
    Braga MM; Morais CC; Nakama RC; Leamari VM; Siqueira WL; Mendes FM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e35-41. PubMed ID: 19778733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Brouwer F; Askar H; Paris S; Schwendicke F
    J Dent Res; 2016 Feb; 95(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 26464398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.