67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22103331)
1. Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional "trolley problem".
Navarrete CD; McDonald MM; Mott ML; Asher B
Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 22103331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: to be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor?
Xiao W; Wu Q; Yang Q; Zhou L; Jiang Y; Zhang J; Miao D; Peng J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117540. PubMed ID: 25689521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To bridge or not to bridge: Moral Judgement in Cocaine Use Disorders, a case-control study on human morality.
Mosca A; Miuli A; Mancusi G; Chiappini S; Stigliano G; De Pasquale A; Di Petta G; Bubbico G; Pasino A; Pettorruso M; Martinotti G
Soc Neurosci; 2023 Dec; 18(5):271-281. PubMed ID: 37594151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of moral decision-making: Evidence from the trolley dilemma.
Gosling CJ; Trémolière B
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jun; 74(6):981-990. PubMed ID: 33629641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How does the method change what we measure? Comparing virtual reality and text-based surveys for the assessment of moral decisions in traffic dilemmas.
Sütfeld LR; Ehinger BV; König P; Pipa G
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223108. PubMed ID: 31596864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nostalgia increases punitiveness by intensifying moral concern.
Lasaleta JD; Wildschut T; Sedikides C
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11425. PubMed ID: 38763931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the Effects of Hypothetical Moral Preferences on Real-Life and Hypothetical Behavior: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
Evans AM; Brandt MJ
Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1380-1382. PubMed ID: 31361587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Self-Sacrifice in Moral Dilemmas.
Sachdeva S; Iliev R; Ekhtiari H; Dehghani M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127409. PubMed ID: 26075881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Search for an Appropriate Behavior within the Emotional Regulation in Virtual Creatures Using a Learning Classifier System.
Rosales JH; Ramos F; Ramos M; Cervantes JA
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2017; 2017():5204083. PubMed ID: 29209362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation to Save Lives.
Voigt PE
Simul Healthc; 2023 Aug; 18(4):283-284. PubMed ID: 36730537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas.
Patil I; Cogoni C; Zangrando N; Chittaro L; Silani G
Soc Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 9(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 24359489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How German and Italian Laypeople Reason about Distributive Shortages during COVID-19.
Demel R; Grassi F; Rafiee Y; Waldmann MR; Schacht A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contextualizing sacrificial dilemmas within Covid-19 for the study of moral judgment.
Carron R; Blanc N; Brigaud E
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273521. PubMed ID: 35994508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.
van Honk J; Terburg D; Montoya ER; Grafman J; Stein DJ; Morgan B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2119072119. PubMed ID: 35878039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral Decision-Making During COVID-19: Moral Judgements, Moralisation, and Everyday Behaviour.
Francis KB; McNabb CB
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():769177. PubMed ID: 35185677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies.
Luis EO; Akrivou K; Bermejo-Martins E; Scalzo G; Orón JV
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():686928. PubMed ID: 35153881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral judgment, decision times and emotional salience of a new developed set of sacrificial manual driving dilemmas.
Bruno G; Sarlo M; Lotto L; Cellini N; Cutini S; Spoto A
Curr Psychol; 2022 Jan; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 35035197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions.
Christen M; Narvaez D; Zenk JD; Villano M; Crowell CR; Moore DR
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247273. PubMed ID: 33755672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design Bioethics: A Theoretical Framework and Argument for Innovation in Bioethics Research.
Pavarini G; McMillan R; Robinson A; Singh I
Am J Bioeth; 2021 Jun; 21(6):37-50. PubMed ID: 33502959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is It Still Double Edged? Not for University Students' Development of Moral Reasoning and Video Game Play.
Hodge SE; Taylor J; McAlaney J
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1313. PubMed ID: 32595573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
