These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22103757)
1. A test of Bayesian observer models of processing in the Eriksen flanker task. White CN; Brown S; Ratcliff R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):489-97. PubMed ID: 22103757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors? Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal feature integration in visual search. Vincent BT; Baddeley RJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):15.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology. Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms. Mattler U Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. Caparos S; Linnell KJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of acute exercise on cognitive control required during an Eriksen flanker task. Davranche K; Hall B; McMorris T J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2009 Oct; 31(5):628-39. PubMed ID: 20016112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction. Snow JC; Mattingley JB Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No capacity limit in attentional tracking: evidence for probabilistic inference under a resource constraint. Ma WJ; Huang W J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):3.1-30. PubMed ID: 20053066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Eckstein MP; Drescher BA; Shimozaki SS Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):973-80. PubMed ID: 17176430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the speed of pop-out in feature search. Turatto M; Valsecchi M; Seiffert AE; Caramazza A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1145-52. PubMed ID: 20718563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention. Eckstein MP; Peterson MF; Pham BT; Droll JA Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1097-128. PubMed ID: 19138699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis. He J; McCarley JS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]