These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22103882)

  • 21. Bone formation following implantation of bone biomaterials into extraction sites.
    Molly L; Vandromme H; Quirynen M; Schepers E; Adams JL; van Steenberghe D
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 18533791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical histology of microimplants placed in two different biomaterials.
    Lindgren C; Sennerby L; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 20162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of xenograft (ABBM) particle size on vital bone formation following maxillary sinus augmentation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical histomorphometric trial.
    Testori T; Wallace SS; Trisi P; Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 23820706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results.
    Valentini P; Abensur DJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 12939008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Schmitt CM; Doering H; Schmidt T; Lutz R; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):576-85. PubMed ID: 22324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bovine bone grafts with simultaneous implant placement: a 5-year prospective follow-up study.
    Özkan Y; Akoğlu B; Kulak-Özkan Y
    Implant Dent; 2011 Dec; 20(6):455-9. PubMed ID: 22067600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Slow resorption of anorganic bovine bone by osteoclasts in maxillary sinus augmentation.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Hernández-Cortés P; Mesa F; Carranza N; Juodzbalys G; Aguilar M; O'Valle F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):858-66. PubMed ID: 22376122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clinical and histological case series study on calcium sulfate for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants.
    Dasmah A; Hallman M; Sennerby L; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 19843103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immediate fixed implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla after bilateral sinus floor augmentation: a 12-month pilot study.
    Pieri F; Aldini NN; Fini M; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e67-82. PubMed ID: 21745321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs.
    Jensen SS; Broggini N; Hjørting-Hansen E; Schenk R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16672017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
    Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term bony integration and resorption kinetics of a xenogeneic bone substitute after sinus floor augmentation: histomorphometric analyses of human biopsy specimens.
    Klein MO; Kämmerer PW; Götz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(4):e101-10. PubMed ID: 23820714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment of maxillary ridge resorption by sinus augmentation with iliac cancellous bone, anorganic bovine bone, and endosseous implants: a clinical and histologic report.
    Maiorana C; Redemagni M; Rabagliati M; Salina S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 11151588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations.
    de Vicente JC; Hernández-Vallejo G; Braña-Abascal P; Peña I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 20443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histological and Histomorphometric Human Results of HA-Beta-TCP 30/70 Compared to Three Different Biomaterials in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation at 6 Months: A Preliminary Report.
    Annibali S; Iezzi G; Sfasciotti GL; Cristalli MP; Vozza I; Mangano C; La Monaca G; Polimeni A
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():156850. PubMed ID: 26273589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Histomorphometric comparison of a biphasic bone ceramic to anorganic bovine bone for sinus augmentation: 6- to 8-month postsurgical assessment of vital bone formation. A pilot study.
    Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Cho SC; Elian N; Tarnow DP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Jun; 28(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 18605603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
    Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans.
    Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D
    J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of two different absorbable membranes for the coverage of lateral osteotomy sites in maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study.
    Gassling V; Purcz N; Braesen JH; Will M; Gierloff M; Behrens E; Açil Y; Wiltfang J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23218506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.