186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22104233)
1. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
Marshall NW; Smet M; Hofmans M; Pauwels H; De Clercq T; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Physical image properties of digital radiography systems in low dose range].
Kunitomo H; Ichikawa K; Higashide R; Ohashi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):961-9. PubMed ID: 22975694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study of appropriate dosing in consideration of image quality and patient dose on the digital radiography].
Kishimoto K; Ariga E; Ishigaki R; Imai M; Kawamoto K; Kobayashi K; Sawada M; Noto K; Nakamae M; Higashide R
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1381-97. PubMed ID: 22104230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Campanini R; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Danielli C; Angelini L; Maggi S
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
