166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22104234)
1. [Radiation reduction and image quality improvement with iterative reconstruction at multidetector-row computed tomography].
Kihara S; Murazaki H; Hatemura M; Sakumura H; Morisaki T; Funama Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1426-32. PubMed ID: 22104234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Jia Q; Zhuang J; Jiang J; Li J; Huang M; Liang C
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():190-197. PubMed ID: 28027746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of ground-glass opacities by use of hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) and low-dose 256-section computed tomography: a phantom study.
Higuchi K; Nagao M; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Yabuuchi H; Hatkenaka M; Honda H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 23400447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations.
Thomas AK; Southard R; Curran J; Augustyn R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 29189401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.
Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography.
Hou Y; Liu X; Xv S; Guo W; Guo Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 22915398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-Resolution Computed Tomography Examinations for Chronic Suppurative Lung Disease in Early Childhood: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality Evaluations With Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Use.
Smarda M; Efstathopoulos E; Mazioti A; Kordolaimi S; Ploussi A; Priftis K; Kelekis N; Alexopoulou E
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 27147486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of iterative model-based reconstruction versus conventional filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques: lesion conspicuity and influence of body size in anthropomorphic liver phantoms.
Yoon JH; Lee JM; Yu MH; Baek JH; Jeon JH; Hur BY; Dhanantwari A; Chung SY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 25321625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose
Barca P; Domenichelli S; Golfieri R; Pierotti L; Spagnoli L; Tomasi S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102517. PubMed ID: 36669326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low radiation dose 256-MDCT angiography of the carotid arteries: effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on noise, artifacts, and image quality.
Kondratyev E; Karmazanovsky G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2233-9. PubMed ID: 24094643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest: image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50% radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100% radiation dose.
May MS; Eller A; Stahl C; Wuest W; Scharf M; Hammon M; Dankerl P; Schlechtweg PM; Allmendinger T; Sedlmair M; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 24477504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance.
Li K; Tang J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041906. PubMed ID: 24694137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT.
Dobeli KL; Lewis SJ; Meikle SR; Thiele DL; Brennan PC
Br J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 86(1023):20120500. PubMed ID: 23392194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
