168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22104237)
1. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.
Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Tezuka N; Nakano Y; Ikeda M; Kirino Y; Hashimoto K; Otani H; Murakami Y; Murata K
Radiat Med; 2008 Dec; 26(10):627-35. PubMed ID: 19132496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fundamentals of relationship between physical image quality and radiation dose in digital radiography].
Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1473-7. PubMed ID: 22104242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital zoom is a useful, simple, and cost-effective method of reducing radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Hasegawa K; Umemoto N; Inoue S; Iio Y; Shibata N; Mizutani T; Sawamura A; Sugiura T; Taniguchi T; Asai T; Yamada M; Ishii H; Murohara T; Shimizu K
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):353-360. PubMed ID: 31939067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract.
Sjöholm B; Geijer H; Persliden J
Acta Radiol; 2005 Oct; 46(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 16334851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of FOV size on cerebral three-dimensional rotational digital subtraction angiography with flat panel detector system].
Kaneko T; Kato H; Hara T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Jun; 65(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 19602804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
