BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22105433)

  • 1. Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies.
    Kase BA; Cormier CM; Costantine MM; Hutchinson M; Ramin SM; Saade GR; Monga M; Blackwell SC
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22105433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.
    Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Birth weight and long-term metabolic outcomes: does the definition of smallness matter?
    Verkauskiene R; Figueras F; Deghmoun S; Chevenne D; Gardosi J; Levy-Marchal M
    Horm Res; 2008; 70(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 18824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of fetal growth reference standards on assessment of cognitive and academic outcomes of very preterm children.
    Charkaluk ML; Marchand-Martin L; Ego A; Zeitlin J; Arnaud C; Burguet A; Marret S; Rozé JC; Vieux R; Kaminski M; Ancel PY; Pierrat V;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Dec; 161(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 22765954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.
    McCowan LM; Harding JE; Stewart AW
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infants of diabetic mothers with abnormal fetal growth missed by standard growth charts.
    Narchi H; Skinner A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 29(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19757264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard.
    Odibo AO; Francis A; Cahill AG; Macones GA; Crane JP; Gardosi J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Mar; 24(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20698736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a correlation between birth weights and first-trimester crown-rump length growth velocity?
    Mongelli M; Reid S; Sankaralingam K; Stamatopoulos N; Condous G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1924-6. PubMed ID: 22468844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size.
    Gardosi J; Clausson B; Francis A
    BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1356-63. PubMed ID: 19538413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction in a socio-economically disadvantaged region.
    Kleijer ME; Dekker GA; Heard AR
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jul; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16105788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parity-Adjusted Term Neonatal Growth Chart Modifies Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification.
    Kofman R; Farkash R; Rottenstreich M; Samueloff A; Wasserteil N; Kasirer Y; Grisaru Granovsky S
    J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 35683486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality.
    Zhang X; Platt RW; Cnattingius S; Joseph KS; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 17378820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal characteristics of a cohort of preterm infants with a birth weight ≤750 g without major structural anomalies and chromosomal abnormalities.
    Claas MJ; de Vries LS; Bruinse HW
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 May; 28(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 21225562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small for gestational age neonates--are we missing some by only using standard population growth standards and does it matter?
    Narchi H; Skinner A; Williams B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19565425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of intrauterine fetal death in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: impact of including ultrasound biometry in customized models.
    Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Odibo L; Roehl K; Macones GA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 21538642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies.
    Weissmann-Brenner A; Simchen MJ; Zilberberg E; Kalter A; Weisz B; Achiron R; Dulitzky M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):844-9. PubMed ID: 22471810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perinatal outcomes in large infants using customised birthweight centiles and conventional measures of high birthweight.
    Pasupathy D; McCowan LM; Poston L; Kenny LC; Dekker GA; North RA;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 26(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 23061690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.
    Amini SB; Catalano PM; Hirsch V; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 8127523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal birth weight percentile cut-offs in defining small- or large-for-gestational-age.
    Xu H; Simonet F; Luo ZC
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Apr; 99(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 20064130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between the first and second pregnancies and risk of large-for-gestational-age birth.
    Getahun D; Ananth CV; Peltier MR; Salihu HM; Scorza WE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):530.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17547882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.