These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22107443)

  • 1. Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 22107443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.
    Jennings SG; Strickland EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2497-513. PubMed ID: 23039444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioural estimates of auditory filter widths in ferrets using notched-noise maskers.
    Alves-Pinto A; Sollini J; Wells T; Sumner CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):EL19-24. PubMed ID: 26936579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1561-72. PubMed ID: 22978885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Oct; 76(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 6501701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.
    Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal coherence versus harmonicity in auditory stream formation.
    Micheyl C; Kreft H; Shamma S; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):EL188-94. PubMed ID: 23464127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.
    Jennings SG; Strickland EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2483-96. PubMed ID: 23039443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.
    Shen Y; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1134-45. PubMed ID: 23927113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task.
    Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical feasibility of fast psychophysical tuning curves evaluated using normally hearing adults: success rate, range of tip shift, repeatability, and comparison of methods used for estimation of frequency at the tip.
    Myers J; Malicka AN
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):887-94. PubMed ID: 25156231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound.
    Alain C; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):126-35. PubMed ID: 22101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychoacoustic analyses of cochlear mechanisms in tinnitus patients with normal auditory thresholds.
    Buzo BC; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24168288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves.
    Sęk A; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 21299376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of internal noise in auditory perceptual learning.
    Jones PR; Moore DR; Amitay S; Shub DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):970-81. PubMed ID: 23363114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 240(1-2):93-101. PubMed ID: 18440738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
    Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.