These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22107447)

  • 1. Wind noise in hearing aids: I. Effect of wide dynamic range compression and modulation-based noise reduction.
    Chung K
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22107447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wind noise in hearing aids: II. Effect of microphone directivity.
    Chung K
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 22111542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
    Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of spectral characteristics of wind noise between omnidirectional and directional microphones.
    Chung K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4508-17. PubMed ID: 22712924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation.
    Zakis JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3897-907. PubMed ID: 21682412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Chung K; Mongeau L; McKibben N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2243-59. PubMed ID: 19354400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Stangl E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
    Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microphone directionality, pre-emphasis filter, and wind noise in cochlear implants.
    Chung K; McKibben N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):586-600. PubMed ID: 22192604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SVD-based optimal filtering for noise reduction in dual microphone hearing aids: a real time implementation and perceptual evaluation.
    Maj JB; Royackers L; Moonen M; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 52(9):1563-73. PubMed ID: 16189969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers.
    Keidser G; Rohrseitz K; Dillon H; Hamacher V; Carter L; Rass U; Convery E
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):563-79. PubMed ID: 17062498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid.
    Weiss M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.