297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22108450)
21. Fecal occult blood testing when colonoscopy capacity is limited.
Wilschut JA; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Hol L; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; van Ballegooijen M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Dec; 103(23):1741-51. PubMed ID: 22076285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Imperfect Compliance With Instructions for Fecal Sample Collection on Diagnostic Performance of 9 Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
Gies A; Gruner LF; Schrotz-King P; Brenner H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 17(9):1829-1839.e4. PubMed ID: 30851476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.
van Rossum LG; van Rijn AF; Laheij RJ; van Oijen MG; Fockens P; van Krieken HH; Verbeek AL; Jansen JB; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jul; 135(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 18482589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Direct comparison of ten quantitative fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin stability in colorectal cancer screening.
Gies A; Cuk K; Schrotz-King P; Brenner H
Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 9(7):168. PubMed ID: 29976921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT).
Hoff G; Grotmol T; Thiis-Evensen E; Bretthauer M; Gondal G; Vatn MH
Gut; 2004 Sep; 53(9):1329-33. PubMed ID: 15306594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cumulative evaluation of a quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test to determine its optimal clinical use.
Rozen P; Comaneshter D; Levi Z; Hazazi R; Vilkin A; Maoz E; Birkenfeld S; Niv Y
Cancer; 2010 May; 116(9):2115-25. PubMed ID: 20186820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Colorectal cancer screening adherence is higher with fecal immunochemical tests than guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests: a randomized, controlled trial.
Hoffman RM; Steel S; Yee EF; Massie L; Schrader RM; Murata GH
Prev Med; 2010; 50(5-6):297-9. PubMed ID: 20307568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analytical comparison of three quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
Guittet L; Guillaume E; Levillain R; Beley P; Tichet J; Lantieri O; Launoy G
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1492-501. PubMed ID: 21576271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Attendance and yield over three rounds of population-based fecal immunochemical test screening.
Kapidzic A; Grobbee EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; van Vuuren AJ; Spijker W; Izelaar K; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 109(8):1257-64. PubMed ID: 24980879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High rate of advanced adenoma detection in 4 rounds of colorectal cancer screening with the fecal immunochemical test.
Crotta S; Segnan N; Paganin S; Dagnes B; Rosset R; Senore C
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 10(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 22426085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of sample return time and ambient temperature on the performance of an immunochemical faecal occult blood test with a new buffer for colorectal cancer screening.
Dancourt V; Hamza S; Manfredi S; Drouillard A; Bidan JM; Faivre J; Lepage C
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Mar; 25(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 25830897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing sampling device for the fecal immunochemical test increases colonoscopy yields in colorectal cancer screening.
Huang Y; Li Q; Ge W; Hu Y; Cai S; Yuan Y; Zhang S; Zheng S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Mar; 25(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25768975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fresh vs Frozen Samples and Ambient Temperature Have Little Effect on Detection of Colorectal Cancer or Adenomas by a Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Cohort in Germany.
Chen H; Werner S; Brenner H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Oct; 15(10):1547-1556.e5. PubMed ID: 27793749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stable hemoglobin concentration with fecal immunochemical test at high temperatures in a Caribbean colorectal cancer screening program.
Blake SN; Kortlever TL; Verbrugge SE; van Vuuren AJ; Dekker E; van der Vlugt M; Hugtenburg JG
Clin Chim Acta; 2024 Jun; 560():119723. PubMed ID: 38735515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interval fecal immunochemical testing in a colonoscopic surveillance program speeds detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Lane JM; Chow E; Young GP; Good N; Smith A; Bull J; Sandford J; Morcom J; Bampton PA; Cole SR
Gastroenterology; 2010 Dec; 139(6):1918-26. PubMed ID: 20723544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Comparison of Fecal Immunochemical and High-Sensitivity Guaiac Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Shapiro JA; Bobo JK; Church TR; Rex DK; Chovnick G; Thompson TD; Zauber AG; Lieberman D; Levin TR; Joseph DA; Nadel MR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 112(11):1728-1735. PubMed ID: 29016558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A New-Generation Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Is Superior to Quaiac-based Test in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia Among Colonoscopy Referral Patients.
Vasilyev S; Smirnova E; Popov D; Semenov A; Eklund C; Hendolin P; Paloheimo L; Syrjänen K
Anticancer Res; 2015 May; 35(5):2873-80. PubMed ID: 25964570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of age- and gender-specific cut-off values for the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin in colorectal cancer screening.
Alvarez-Urturi C; Andreu M; Hernandez C; Perez-Riquelme F; Carballo F; Ono A; Cruzado J; Cubiella J; Hernandez V; Mao CG; Perez E; Salas D; Andrés M; Bujanda L; Portillo I; Sarasqueta C; Quintero E; Morillas JD; Lanas A; Sostres C; Augé JM; Castells A; Bessa X;
Dig Liver Dis; 2016 May; 48(5):542-551. PubMed ID: 26936343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.
Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Nieuwenburg SAV; Kapidzic A; van Roon AHC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker WWJ; Izelaar K; Bruno MJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MCW
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 31196734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Faecal haemoglobin concentration among subjects with negative FIT results is associated with the detection rate of neoplasia at subsequent rounds: a prospective study in the context of population based screening programmes in Italy.
Senore C; Zappa M; Campari C; Crotta S; Armaroli P; Arrigoni A; Cassoni P; Colla R; Fracchia M; Gili F; Grazzini G; Lolli R; Menozzi P; Orione L; Polizzi S; Rapi S; Riggi E; Rubeca T; Sassatelli R; Visioli C; Segnan N
Gut; 2020 Mar; 69(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 31455608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
