These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Increased sensitivity to error during decision-making in bipolar disorder patients with acute mania. Minassian A; Paulus MP; Perry W J Affect Disord; 2004 Oct; 82(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 15488248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of budget and reinforcement location on risk-sensitive preference. O'Daly M; Case DA; Fantino E Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 16737783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The sunk cost effect across species: A review of persistence in a course of action due to prior investment. Magalhães P; Geoffrey White K J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):339-61. PubMed ID: 27151560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Harm to others reduces the sunk-cost effect. Hamzagic ZI; Derksen DG; Matsuba MK; Aßfalg A; Bernstein DM Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):544-556. PubMed ID: 33169344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Blind to Bias? Young Children Do Not Anticipate that Sunk Costs Lead to Irrational Choices. Sehl CG; Friedman O; Denison S Cogn Sci; 2021 Nov; 45(11):e13063. PubMed ID: 34762743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The feeling of throwing good money after bad: The role of affective reaction in the sunk-cost fallacy. Dijkstra KA; Hong YY PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209900. PubMed ID: 30620741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Neural mechanisms and personality correlates of the sunk cost effect. Fujino J; Fujimoto S; Kodaka F; Camerer CF; Kawada R; Tsurumi K; Tei S; Isobe M; Miyata J; Sugihara G; Yamada M; Fukuyama H; Murai T; Takahashi H Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33171. PubMed ID: 27611212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering. Brown GS; White KG J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19364232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009). Zentall TR; Stagner JP J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Persisting on the past: Cross-sectional and prospective associations between sunk cost propensity and cannabis use. Sofis MJ; Lemley SM; Budney AJ; Stanger C; Jarmolowicz DP Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020 Apr; 28(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 31070426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action. Laties VG Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):1880-8. PubMed ID: 1097270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice. Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective timing in pigeons: Isolating temporal perception in the time-left procedure. Vieira de Castro AC; Machado A Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):490-9. PubMed ID: 20176092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sunk costs under stress: Acute stress reduces the impact of past expenses on risky decisions. Schulreich S; Dandolo LC; Schwabe L Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2022 Mar; 137():105632. PubMed ID: 34929554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Relative numerousness judgements in crows and pigeons in the urgent comparison of stimuli earlier linked to different amounts of reinforcement]. Zorin ZA; Kalinina TS; Maĭorova ME; Mikitich IuB; Khurtina AV Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1991; 41(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 1651621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule. Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]