184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22109296)
1. Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT.
Noël PB; Fingerle AA; Renger B; Münzel D; Rummeny EJ; Dobritz M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1404-9. PubMed ID: 22109296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography.
Hou Y; Liu X; Xv S; Guo W; Guo Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 22915398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations.
Thomas AK; Southard R; Curran J; Augustyn R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 29189401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose
Barca P; Domenichelli S; Golfieri R; Pierotti L; Spagnoli L; Tomasi S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102517. PubMed ID: 36669326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths.
Song JS; Lee JM; Sohn JY; Yoon JH; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiol Med; 2015 Mar; 120(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 25168773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-Resolution Computed Tomography Examinations for Chronic Suppurative Lung Disease in Early Childhood: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality Evaluations With Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Use.
Smarda M; Efstathopoulos E; Mazioti A; Kordolaimi S; Ploussi A; Priftis K; Kelekis N; Alexopoulou E
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 27147486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose.
Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.
Hara AK; Paden RG; Silva AC; Kujak JL; Lawder HJ; Pavlicek W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 19696291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MODEL-BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION ENABLES THE EVALUATION OF THIN-SLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES WITHOUT DEGRADING IMAGE QUALITY OR INCREASING RADIATION DOSE.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):100-6. PubMed ID: 26590394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individualized kV selection and tube current reduction in excretory phase computed tomography urography: potential for radiation dose reduction and the contribution of iterative reconstruction to image quality.
Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Takahashi N; Hartman RP; Nathan MA; Carter RE; Yu L; Leng S; Kagoshima H; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 23863531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging dose management using multi-resolution in CT-guided radiation therapy.
Sheng K; Jeraj R; Shaw R; Mackie TR; Paliwal BR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1205-19. PubMed ID: 15798317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
