These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22109377)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealant with light-cured flowable resin and light-cured pit and fissure sealants].
    Cao HZ; Shu CB; Wang S; Huang W
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Oct; 20(5):545-7. PubMed ID: 22109377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].
    Yan WJ; Zheng JJ; Chen XX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):911-914. PubMed ID: 30337757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An
    Singh C; Kaur K; Kapoor K
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of two light cured pit and fissure sealants for preventing pit and fissure caries in children].
    Ji PH; Xu QL; Jiang ZM; Ba Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Jun; 15(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 16862360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 26531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with different etching adhesive and 3M-Z350 flowable resin on young permanent teeth].
    Xu QL; Ji PH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Oct; 21(5):563-5. PubMed ID: 23135189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
    Amin HE
    J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
    Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Argon laser curing of fluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealant: in vitro caries development.
    Westerman G; Hicks J; Flaitz C
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):385-90, 374. PubMed ID: 11204060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An
    Nirwan M; Nigam AG; Marwah N; Nayak UA; Bansal A; Gahlot MS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.
    Jafarzadeh M; Malekafzali B; Tadayon N; Fallahi S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2010; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21998768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface topography and enamel-resin interface of pit and fissure sealants following visible light and argon laser polymerization: an in vitro study.
    Hicks MJ; Westerman GH; Flaitz CM; Powell GL
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(3):169-75, 160. PubMed ID: 10902074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with self-etching adhesive on permanent teeth].
    Peng SM; Zhao W; Lin JC; Ling JQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Dec; 15(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 17533704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost minimisation analysis of two dental sealing methods in an outreach dental program.
    Liu B; Wang W
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103687. PubMed ID: 33961937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pit and fissure sealant for caries prevention in 457 children in Uygur city: results of 2-year follow-up].
    Riziwaguli A; Liu JY; Ma YR; Zou J
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Apr; 23(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 24935844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taneja S; Singh A
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(4):50-55. PubMed ID: 32597778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of a fissure sealant and a flowable composite: A 36-month split-mouth, randomized clinical study.
    Ozan G; Sancakli HS; Erdemir U; Yaman BC; Yildiz SO; Yildiz E
    J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104205. PubMed ID: 35724939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.