These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22109382)
1. Prediction, based on resection margins, of long-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization. Miyoshi Y; Miyatake T; Ueda Y; Morimoto A; Yokoyama T; Matsuzaki S; Kimura T; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Ohashi H; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1427-32. PubMed ID: 22109382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability. Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Ikeda M; Mikami M; Yasaka M; Enomoto T; Kobayashi Y; Nagase S; Yokoyama M; Katabuchi H J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses. Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins. Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin]. Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization. Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study. Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization. Ge Y; Liu Y; Cheng Y; Liu Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(27):e26359. PubMed ID: 34232170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes of photodynamic therapy for a positive resection margin after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. Kim M; Choi MC; Lee C; Na YJ; Kim SJ Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102639. PubMed ID: 34823035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature. Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients. Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy of cervical conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women. Holcomb K; Matthews RP; Chapman JE; Abulafia O; Lee YC; Borges A; Buhl A Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 10479504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]