275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22109764)
1. Effect of technological advances on cochlear implant performance in adults.
Lenarz M; Joseph G; Sönmez H; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 22109764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients.
Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1361-5. PubMed ID: 22539093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients.
Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22374914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
Chen X; Liu B; Liu S; Mo L; Li Y; Kong Y; Zheng J; Li Y; Gong S; Han D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.
Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22344289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.
Seebens Y; Diller G
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 22094825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants in children with sequential surgery.
Strøm-Roum H; Laurent C; Wie OB
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 76(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 22075133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
