These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22110062)

  • 1. Object frequency characteristics of visual acuity.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR; Lim JI; Shahidi M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9534-8. PubMed ID: 22110062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributions of optical and non-optical blur to variation in visual acuity.
    McAnany JJ; Shahidi M; Applegate RA; Zelkha R; Alexander KR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 21460756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural constraints on visual acuity in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
    McAnany JJ; Wanek J; Zelkha R; Lim JI; Chau F; Shahidi M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 91(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 24317136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new source of variance in visual acuity.
    Coppens JE; van den Berg TJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Apr; 44(9):951-8. PubMed ID: 14992839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of scotopic and photopic conventional visual acuity and hyperacuity.
    Freundlieb PH; Herbik A; Kramer FH; Bach M; Hoffmann MB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 258(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 31754827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(26):2615-24. PubMed ID: 18374385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tool for Screening Visual Acuity in Older Individuals With Dementia.
    Kergoat H; Law C; Chriqui E; Leclerc BS; Kergoat MJ
    Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen; 2017 Mar; 32(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 28116912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.
    Alexander KR; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 87(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 19996815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?
    Mataftsi A; Koutsimpogeorgos D; Brazitikos P; Ziakas N; Haidich AB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 257(7):1513-1517. PubMed ID: 31069515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaired mesopic visual acuity in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration.
    Puell MC; Barrio AR; Palomo-Alvarez C; Gómez-Sanz FJ; Clement-Corral A; Pérez-Carrasco MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7310-4. PubMed ID: 23033386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.
    Odell NV; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Adams WE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Apr; 13(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19071047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.
    Bach M; Maurer JP; Wolf ME
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 92(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18303162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.