145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2211083)
1. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. She's going to die: the case of Angela C.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3350646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re A.C.
District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc
Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re A.C.
Bourke LH
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
Stanyer BT
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights.
Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's reproductive rights. Is there a conflict with a child's right to be born free from defects?
Schedler G
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):357-84. PubMed ID: 3490529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C.
Tuohey JF
Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary.
Brenner B; Burnet P
N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal-fetal conflicts. Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives.
King NM
J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 1757822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
Noble-Allgire AM
J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
Gindes D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
Shriner TL
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. C-section for organ donation.
Berkowitz ST; Newman LE; Mathieu DR
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(2):22; discussion 22-4. PubMed ID: 2318622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lives at stake. How to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(7):18-27. PubMed ID: 10120198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
Finamore EP
Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
Rowan C
Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision making with pregnant patients: a policy born of experience.
Mishkin DB; Povar GJ
Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1993 Aug; 19(8):291-302. PubMed ID: 8220807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
