BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22111521)

  • 1. Potential influence of selection criteria on the demographic composition of students in an Australian medical school.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Carr SE; Louden W
    BMC Med Educ; 2011 Nov; 11():97. PubMed ID: 22111521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia.
    Hay M; Mercer AM; Lichtwark I; Tran S; Hodgson WC; Aretz HT; Armstrong EG; Gorman D
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 May; 22(2):533-551. PubMed ID: 27804091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach.
    Shulruf B; O'Sullivan A; Velan G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32295582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical student selection criteria and socio-demographic factors as predictors of ultimately working rurally after graduation.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Playford DE; Riley GJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():74. PubMed ID: 25890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes.
    Griffin B; Horton GL; Lampe L; Shulruf B; Hu W
    Med J Aust; 2021 Feb; 214(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 33258184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 14():31. PubMed ID: 24528509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 13():155. PubMed ID: 24286571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. James Cook University's rurally orientated medical school selection process: quality graduates and positive workforce outcomes.
    Ray RA; Woolley T; Sen Gupta T
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(4):3424. PubMed ID: 26442581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Have rural background students been disadvantaged by the medical school admission process?
    Wright B; Woloschuk W
    Med Educ; 2008 May; 42(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 18346118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of selection criteria to subsequent academic performance in an Australian undergraduate dental school.
    Mercer A; Abbott PV; Puddey IB
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2013 Feb; 17(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23279391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical student selection criteria as predictors of intended rural practice following graduation.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Playford DE; Pougnault S; Riley GJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 14():218. PubMed ID: 25315743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A holistic review of the medical school admission process: examining correlates of academic underperformance.
    Stratton TD; Elam CL
    Med Educ Online; 2014; 19():22919. PubMed ID: 24695362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study.
    Adam J; Bore M; Childs R; Dunn J; Mckendree J; Munro D; Powis D
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(9):868-80. PubMed ID: 25665628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of UKCAT scores in student selection by U.K. medical schools, 2006-2010.
    Adam J; Dowell J; Greatrix R
    BMC Med Educ; 2011 Nov; 11():98. PubMed ID: 22114935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine.
    Griffin B; Hu W
    Med Educ; 2015 Jan; 49(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 25545578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of medical students with rural origin: implications for selective admission policies.
    Matsumoto M; Inoue K; Kajii E
    Health Policy; 2008 Aug; 87(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 18243398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools.
    Edwards D; Friedman T; Pearce J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():173. PubMed ID: 24373207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of accelerated, graduate-entry medicine courses: a comparison of profile, success, and specialty destination between graduate entrants to accelerated or standard medicine courses in UK.
    Garrud P; McManus IC
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):250. PubMed ID: 30400933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The UKCAT-12 study: educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools.
    McManus IC; Dewberry C; Nicholson S; Dowell JS
    BMC Med; 2013 Nov; 11():244. PubMed ID: 24229380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.