These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22111929)

  • 21. The effect of occlusal surface relief of dies on marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic casting copings.
    Saber FS; Abolfazli N; Mahboub F; Razavi FE
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 23279044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns.
    Ucar Y; Akova T; Akyil MS; Brantley WA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 19782828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
    Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel-Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
    Ziaei M; Bajoghli F; Sabouhi M; Jowkar M; Nadian F; Manshaei F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Nov; 24(11):826-833. PubMed ID: 38238268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation of implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with gold cylinders.
    Sutherland JK; Ritsco RG; Budd SR
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 9743663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Marginal Fit of Metal Copings in Two Different States with and without Using Ring Liners: An
    Kadam PP; Patil R; Gachake A; More V; Sawant H; Kalsekar B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 35343451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
    Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparative adaptation of crowns of selective laser melting and wax-lost-casting method].
    Li GQ; Shen QY; Gao JH; Wu XY; Chen L; Dai WA
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 47(7):427-30. PubMed ID: 22931575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Discrepancies of Co-Cr Metal Copings Prepared via CAD/CAM and Conventional Casting.
    Dayan SC; Kiseri B; Gencel B; Kurt A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30762994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro assessment of a ceramic-pressed-to-metal system as an alternative to conventional metal ceramic systems.
    Fahmy NZ; Salah E
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 22182223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
    Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of three-dimensional marginal adaptation among three all-ceramic crown systems.
    Zhang Y; Li J; Xue XQ; Chen ZY; Li XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Oct; 20(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 22109367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of melting and casting methods and finish line design on the marginal discrepancy of nickel-chromium-titanium alloy crowns.
    Cogolludo PG; Suarez MJ; Peláez J; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):443-5. PubMed ID: 20859560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
    Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.