BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22112778)

  • 1. The potential benefit of swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction: an in silico planning comparative study.
    van der Laan HP; Christianen ME; Bijl HP; Schilstra C; Langendijk JA
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Apr; 103(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 22112778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The potential of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction in the treatment of head and neck cancer: A planning comparative study.
    van der Laan HP; van de Water TA; van Herpt HE; Christianen ME; Bijl HP; Korevaar EW; Rasch CR; van 't Veld AA; van der Schaaf A; Schilstra C; Langendijk JA;
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 22708528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Swallowing-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients: treatment planning optimization and clinical introduction.
    van der Laan HP; Gawryszuk A; Christianen ME; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW; Chouvalova O; Wopken K; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Jun; 107(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23742959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost in head-and-neck cancer: is there a place for critical swallowing structures dose sparing?
    Cilla S; Deodato F; Macchia G; Digesù C; Ianiro A; Piermattei A; Valentini V; Morganti AG
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1059):20150764. PubMed ID: 26728543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
    Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy versus standard parotid sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ashour MG; Shouman TH; Hassouna AH; Mokhtar MH; Emad El Din R; Youssef AA; Gomaa MM; Abdelgeleel S
    Acta Oncol; 2022 Feb; 61(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 35000532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (SW-IMRT) in head and neck cancer: Clinical validation according to the model-based approach.
    Christianen ME; van der Schaaf A; van der Laan HP; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Doornaert P; Chouvalova O; Steenbakkers RJ; Leemans CR; Oosting SF; van der Laan BF; Roodenburg JL; Slotman BJ; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Feb; 118(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 26700602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive modelling for swallowing dysfunction after primary (chemo)radiation: results of a prospective observational study.
    Christianen ME; Schilstra C; Beetz I; Muijs CT; Chouvalova O; Burlage FR; Doornaert P; Koken PW; Leemans CR; Rinkel RN; de Bruijn MJ; de Bock GH; Roodenburg JL; van der Laan BF; Slotman BJ; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Oct; 105(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21907437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II--clinical results.
    Lauve A; Morris M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Wu Q; Mohan R; Abayomi O; Buck D; Holdford D; Dawson K; Dinardo L; Reiter E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):374-87. PubMed ID: 15380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of larynx-sparing techniques with IMRT when treating the head and neck.
    Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Ho KF; Slevin NJ; Mackay RI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18793966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a reduced spot size for intensity-modulated proton therapy potentially improves salivary gland-sparing in oropharyngeal cancer.
    van de Water TA; Lomax AJ; Bijl HP; Schilstra C; Hug EB; Langendijk JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e313-9. PubMed ID: 21708427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces radiation-induced morbidity and improves health-related quality of life: results of a nonrandomized prospective study using a standardized follow-up program.
    Vergeer MR; Doornaert PA; Rietveld DH; Leemans CR; Slotman BJ; Langendijk JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19111400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
    Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
    Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancer aiming to reduce dysphagia: early dose-effect relationships for the swallowing structures.
    Feng FY; Kim HM; Lyden TH; Haxer MJ; Feng M; Worden FP; Chepeha DB; Eisbruch A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1289-98. PubMed ID: 17560051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of salivary gland dosimetry on post-IMRT recovery of saliva output and xerostomia grade for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with or without contralateral submandibular gland sparing: a longitudinal study.
    Wang ZH; Yan C; Zhang ZY; Zhang CP; Hu HS; Tu WY; Kirwan J; Mendenhall WM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1479-87. PubMed ID: 20934262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.