131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22113489)
21. Simple haptotactic gradient generation within a triangular microfluidic channel.
Park J; Kim DH; Kim G; Kim Y; Choi E; Levchenko A
Lab Chip; 2010 Aug; 10(16):2130-8. PubMed ID: 20532357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Controlled microscale diffusion gradients in quiescent extracellular fluid.
Tan DC; Yung LY; Roy P
Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Jun; 12(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 20306143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies.
Haessler U; Kalinin Y; Swartz MA; Wu M
Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Aug; 11(4):827-35. PubMed ID: 19343497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cell micropatterning inside a microchannel and assays under a stable concentration gradient.
Okuyama T; Yamazoe H; Seto Y; Suzuki H; Fukuda J
J Biosci Bioeng; 2010 Aug; 110(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 20547384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Static Microfluidic Device for Investigating the Chemotaxis Response to Stable, Non-linear Gradients.
Sule N; Penarete-Acosta D; Englert DL; Jayaraman A
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1729():47-59. PubMed ID: 29429081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biological applications of microfluidic gradient devices.
Kim S; Kim HJ; Jeon NL
Integr Biol (Camb); 2010 Nov; 2(11-12):584-603. PubMed ID: 20957276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microfluidic device with chemical gradient for single-cell cytotoxicity assays.
Hosokawa M; Hayashi T; Mori T; Yoshino T; Nakasono S; Matsunaga T
Anal Chem; 2011 May; 83(10):3648-54. PubMed ID: 21526753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Construction of oxygen and chemical concentration gradients in a single microfluidic device for studying tumor cell-drug interactions in a dynamic hypoxia microenvironment.
Wang L; Liu W; Wang Y; Wang JC; Tu Q; Liu R; Wang J
Lab Chip; 2013 Feb; 13(4):695-705. PubMed ID: 23254684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Generation of static and dynamic patterned co-cultures using microfabricated parylene-C stencils.
Wright D; Rajalingam B; Selvarasah S; Dokmeci MR; Khademhosseini A
Lab Chip; 2007 Oct; 7(10):1272-9. PubMed ID: 17896010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microfluidic monitoring of Pseudomonas aeruginosa chemotaxis under the continuous chemical gradient.
Jeong HH; Lee SH; Kim JM; Kim HE; Kim YG; Yoo JY; Chang WS; Lee CS
Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Oct; 26(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 20810268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An agar gel membrane-PDMS hybrid microfluidic device for long term single cell dynamic study.
Wong I; Atsumi S; Huang WC; Wu TY; Hanai T; Lam ML; Tang P; Yang J; Liao JC; Ho CM
Lab Chip; 2010 Oct; 10(20):2710-9. PubMed ID: 20664845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A microfluidic device with passive air-bubble valves for real-time measurement of dose-dependent drug cytotoxicity through impedance sensing.
Xu Y; Lv Y; Wang L; Xing W; Cheng J
Biosens Bioelectron; 2012 Feb; 32(1):300-4. PubMed ID: 22208957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diffusion dependent cell behavior in microenvironments.
Yu H; Meyvantsson I; Shkel IA; Beebe DJ
Lab Chip; 2005 Oct; 5(10):1089-95. PubMed ID: 16175265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Generation of stable orthogonal gradients of chemical concentration and substrate stiffness in a microfluidic device.
García S; Sunyer R; Olivares A; Noailly J; Atencia J; Trepat X
Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2606-14. PubMed ID: 25977997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative measurement and control of oxygen levels in microfluidic poly(dimethylsiloxane) bioreactors during cell culture.
Mehta G; Mehta K; Sud D; Song JW; Bersano-Begey T; Futai N; Heo YS; Mycek MA; Linderman JJ; Takayama S
Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Apr; 9(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 17160707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A microfluidic platform for 3-dimensional cell culture and cell-based assays.
Kim MS; Yeon JH; Park JK
Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Feb; 9(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 17103048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Generation of concentration gradient by controlled flow distribution and diffusive mixing in a microfluidic chip.
Yang M; Yang J; Li CW; Zhao J
Lab Chip; 2002 Aug; 2(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15100827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The potential of autofluorescence for the detection of single living cells for label-free cell sorting in microfluidic systems.
Emmelkamp J; Wolbers F; Andersson H; Dacosta RS; Wilson BC; Vermes I; van den Berg A
Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3740-5. PubMed ID: 15565697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A dynamic microarray device for paired bead-based analysis.
Teshima T; Ishihara H; Iwai K; Adachi A; Takeuchi S
Lab Chip; 2010 Sep; 10(18):2443-8. PubMed ID: 20697655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Endothelial cell polarization and chemotaxis in a microfluidic device.
Shamloo A; Ma N; Poo MM; Sohn LL; Heilshorn SC
Lab Chip; 2008 Aug; 8(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 18651071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
