241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22113981)
1. Remote controlled robot assisted cardiac navigation: feasibility assessment and validation in a porcine model.
Ganji Y; Janabi-Sharifi F; Cheema AN
Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 22113981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation.
Nölker G; Gutleben KJ; Muntean B; Vogt J; Horstkotte D; Dabiri Abkenari L; Akca F; Szili-Torok T
Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1715-8. PubMed ID: 22719063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel robotic catheter remote control system: feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture and endocardial catheter navigation.
Saliba W; Cummings JE; Oh S; Zhang Y; Mazgalev TN; Schweikert RA; Burkhardt JD; Natale A
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1102-5. PubMed ID: 16879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial experience with a novel remote-guided magnetic catheter navigation system for left ventricular scar mapping and ablation in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction.
Ray IB; Dukkipati S; Houghtaling C; McPherson CD; Kastelein N; Ruskin JN; Reddy VY
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 18(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 17388912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new minimally invasive heart surgery instrument for atrial fibrillation treatment: first in vitro and animal tests.
Abadie J; Faure A; Chaillet N; Rougeot P; Beaufort D; Goldstein JP; Finlay PA; Bogaerts G
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Jun; 2(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 17520630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamically shaped magnetic fields: initial animal validation of a new remote electrophysiology catheter guidance and control system.
Gang ES; Nguyen BL; Shachar Y; Farkas L; Farkas L; Marx B; Johnson D; Fishbein MC; Gaudio C; Kim SJ
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Oct; 4(5):770-7. PubMed ID: 21690463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.
Arya A; Kottkamp H; Piorkowski C; Bollmann A; Gerdes-Li JH; Riahi S; Esato M; Hindricks G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 May; 31(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 18439175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias: a randomized, multicenter trial.
Wood MA; Orlov M; Ramaswamy K; Haffajee C; Ellenbogen K;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Oct; 31(10):1313-21. PubMed ID: 18811813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A vision guided hybrid robotic prototype system for stereotactic surgery.
Wei J; Wang T; Liu D
Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 21984231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic remote catheter ablation.
Ernst S; Ouyang F; Linder C; Hertting K; Stahl F; Chun J; Hachiya H; Bänsch D; Antz M; Kuck KH
Circulation; 2004 Mar; 109(12):1472-5. PubMed ID: 15023876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience with a telerobotic system to remotely navigate and automatically reposition standard steerable EP catheters.
Cercenelli L; Marcelli E; Plicchi G
ASAIO J; 2007; 53(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 17885323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a force-reflecting robotic platform for cardiac catheter navigation.
Park JW; Choi J; Pak HN; Song SJ; Lee JC; Park Y; Shin SM; Sun K
Artif Organs; 2010 Nov; 34(11):1034-9. PubMed ID: 21092046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kautzner J; Peichl P; Cihák R; Wichterle D; Mlcochová H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S163-6. PubMed ID: 19250085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Right-side RF ablation using remote catheter navigation: experimental results in vivo.
Thakur Y; Jones DL; Skanes A; Yee R; Drangova M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 21806702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic stereotactic catheter ablation on three-dimensional magnetic resonance images in real time.
Dickfeld T; Calkins H; Zviman M; Kato R; Meininger G; Lickfett L; Berger R; Halperin H; Solomon SB
Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(19):2407-13. PubMed ID: 14568905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of robotic navigation and ablation.
Chun KR; Schulte-Hahn B; Windhorst V; Nowak B; Schmidt B
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 21135806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility and safety of remote endovascular catheter navigation in a porcine model.
Bismuth J; Kashef E; Cheshire N; Lumsden AB
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 21521066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remote-controlled vascular interventional surgery robot.
Wang T; Zhang D; Da L
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Jun; 6(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 20235338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and feasibility of frameless stereotactic and robot-assisted CT-based puncture in interventional radiology: a comparative phantom study.
Stoffner R; Augschöll C; Widmann G; Böhler D; Bale R
Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):851-8. PubMed ID: 19517342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic cardiac surgery.
Woo YJ
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 17520636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
