These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22114173)

  • 1. Interrater reliability of Risk Matrix 2000/s.
    Wakeling HC; Mann RE; Milner RJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Dec; 55(8):1324-37. PubMed ID: 22114173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater Reliability of Risk Matrix 2000/s.
    Wakeling HC; Mann RE; Milner RJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 21216783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale evaluation of Risk Matrix 2000 in Scotland.
    Grubin D
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 21965466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings.
    Miller CS; Kimonis ER; Otto RK; Kline SM; Wasserman AL
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Dec; 24(4):944-53. PubMed ID: 22563984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of Vermont assessment of sex offender risk-2 (VASOR-2) reoffense risk scale.
    McGrath RJ; Lasher MP; Cumming GF; Langton CM; Hoke SE
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Jun; 26(3):271-90. PubMed ID: 23630225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).
    Worling JR; Bookalam D; Litteljohn A
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):203-23. PubMed ID: 21969313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are actuarial risk data used to make determinations of sex offender risk classification? An examination of sex offenders selected for enhanced registration and notification.
    Blasko BL; Jeglic EL; Mercado CC
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Aug; 55(5):676-92. PubMed ID: 20592055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity of the risk for sexual violence protocol.
    Vargen LM; Jackson KJ; Hart SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 31697098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)].
    Rossegger A; Gerth J; Urbaniok F; Laubacher A; Endrass J
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2010 Nov; 78(11):658-67. PubMed ID: 21069631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders.
    Wakeling HC; Howard P; Barnett G
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Mar; 23(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 21349831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol for Korean Sexual Offenders: A Field Study.
    Sea J; Hart SD
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2021 Oct; 65(13-14):1423-1445. PubMed ID: 33164610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and wales.
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Howard PD
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):443-70. PubMed ID: 20930189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis.
    Cortoni F; Hanson RK; Coache MÈ
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 21098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using logistic regression modeling to predict sexual recidivism: the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-3 (MnSOST-3).
    Duwe G; Freske PJ
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Aug; 24(4):350-77. PubMed ID: 22291047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An examination of the interrater reliability between practitioners and researchers on the static-99.
    Quesada SP; Calkins C; Jeglic EL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Nov; 58(11):1364-75. PubMed ID: 23864524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment referral for sex offenders based on clinical judgment versus actuarial risk assessment: match and analysis of mismatch.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek D
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Jul; 28(11):2273-89. PubMed ID: 23422846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.