These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22114390)

  • 1. Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study.
    Bhatti N; Sroa R; Sikri VK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Apr; 1(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 22114390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy of Three Engine-driven Instruments: SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX.
    Wigler R; Koren T; Tsesis I
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):910-4. PubMed ID: 26718300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study.
    Shivashankar MB; Niranjan NT; Jayasheel A; Kenchanagoudra MG
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC10-ZC14. PubMed ID: 28050495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Herbst U; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2003 Nov; 36(11):748-56. PubMed ID: 14641438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
    Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth.
    Azar MR; Safi L; Nikaein A
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Mar; 9(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22623929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.
    Kanaparthy A; Kanaparthy R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC130-3. PubMed ID: 27437347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.