These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22114769)

  • 1. A common processing system for the concepts of artifacts and actions? Evidence from a case of a disproportionate conceptual impairment for living things.
    Pillon A; d'Honincthun P
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 28(1):1-43. PubMed ID: 22114769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A domain-specific system for representing knowledge of both man-made objects and human actions. Evidence from a case with an association of deficits.
    Vannuscorps G; Pillon A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2321-41. PubMed ID: 21540045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceptual knowledge in the brain: fMRI evidence for a featural organization.
    Marques JF; Canessa N; Siri S; Catricalà E; Cappa S
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1194():90-9. PubMed ID: 18178180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.
    Zannino GD; Perri R; Pasqualetti P; Di Paola M; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1017-28. PubMed ID: 16352319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Category-specific semantic deficits do not reflect the sensory/functional organization of the brain: a test of the "sensory quality" hypothesis.
    Laiacona M; Capitani E; Caramazza A
    Neurocase; 2003 Jun; 9(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 12925928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When living things and other 'sensory quality' categories behave in the same fashion: a novel category specificity effect.
    Borgo F; Shallice T
    Neurocase; 2001; 7(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 11459917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The organization of the conceptual system: the case of the "object versus action" dimension.
    Pillon A; d'Honincthun P
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Oct; 27(7):587-613. PubMed ID: 22004080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A longitudinal study of category-specific agnosia.
    Thomas RM; Forde EM; Humphreys GW; Graham KS
    Neurocase; 2002; 8(6):466-79. PubMed ID: 12529455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Naming manipulable objects: anatomy of a category specific effect in left temporal tumours.
    Campanella F; D'Agostini S; Skrap M; Shallice T
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1583-97. PubMed ID: 20144630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category-specific knowledge deficit for animals in a patient with herpes simplex encephalitis.
    Blundo C; Ricci M; Miller L
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Dec; 23(8):1248-68. PubMed ID: 21049377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things.
    Thomas R; Forde E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):982-6. PubMed ID: 16253294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questioning the living/nonliving dichotomy: evidence from a patient with an unusual semantic dissociation.
    Siri S; Kensinger EA; Cappa SF; Hood KL; Corkin S
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):630-45. PubMed ID: 14599276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity.
    Farah MJ; McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Dec; 120(4):339-57. PubMed ID: 1837294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects.
    Gerlach C; Law I; Paulson OB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 14(8):1230-9. PubMed ID: 12495528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge.
    Wu DH; Waller S; Chatterjee A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1542-55. PubMed ID: 17714015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Boronat CB; Buxbaum LJ; Coslett HB; Tang K; Saffran EM; Kimberg DY; Detre JA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):361-73. PubMed ID: 15820643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional interactions during the retrieval of conceptual action knowledge: an fMRI study.
    Assmus A; Giessing C; Weiss PH; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17536970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case of impaired knowledge for fruit and vegetables.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2003 May; 20(3):373-400. PubMed ID: 20957576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas.
    Hoenig K; Sim EJ; Bochev V; Herrnberger B; Kiefer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 20(10):1799-814. PubMed ID: 18370598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.
    Kellenbach ML; Brett M; Patterson K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):30-46. PubMed ID: 12590841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.