These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22114949)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Mucci B
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Jan; 67(1):89. PubMed ID: 22114949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threats to the quality of peer-reviewed radiology journals: identification of the problem and possible solutions.
    Berk RN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 3257120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing reviewers.
    Kay S
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Jan; 58(1):1. PubMed ID: 15629160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Not every peer is a Peer].
    Graham G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Apr; 128(14):723-4. PubMed ID: 12673526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quest for excellence (part 2): reviewing a clinical trial for the British Journal of Dermatology.
    Ingram JR
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Dec; 171(6):1277-8. PubMed ID: 25523245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Where is the honor in honorary authorship?
    Kressel HY; Dixon AK
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 21386052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [When abstract conclusions have no sense: a case of British Medical Journal's exemplary actuation].
    Pulido M
    Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Feb; 138(2):87. PubMed ID: 21676413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Support for peer review.
    Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of peer review.
    Carvalho MS; Travassos C; Coeli CM
    Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 26247977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Peer review].
    Roza SJ
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2015; 57(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 26028010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The peer-review process.
    Pearson GS
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2014 Apr; 50(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 24689488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pediatric Radiology Editorial Board - acknowledgements and updates.
    Strouse PJ; Sebag G
    Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Jan; 44(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24292862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.