BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22114994)

  • 1. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries.
    Bates GW; Shomento S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 205(6 Suppl):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22114994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesions following cesarean delivery: a review of their occurrence, consequences and preventative management using adhesion barriers.
    Poole JH
    Womens Health (Lond); 2013 Sep; 9(5):467-77. PubMed ID: 24007252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery.
    Robertson D; Lefebvre G;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jun; 32(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 20569542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peritoneal adhesion prevention at cesarean section: an analysis of the effectiveness of an absorbable adhesion barrier.
    Chapa HO; Venegas G; Vanduyne CP; Antonetti AG; Sandate JP; Silver L
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(3-4):103-9. PubMed ID: 21542525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Kiefer DG; Muscat JC; Santorelli J; Chavez MR; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Vintzileos AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):373.e1-373.e12. PubMed ID: 26478104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsurgery alone or with INTERCEED Absorbable Adhesion Barrier for pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. The INTERCEED (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group II.
    Azziz R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Aug; 177(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8342092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility.
    Farquhar C; Vandekerckhove P; Watson A; Vail A; Wiseman D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000475. PubMed ID: 10796548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it.
    Walfisch A; Beloosesky R; Shrim A; Hallak M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 24858198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
    Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.
    Ahmad G; Duffy JM; Farquhar C; Vail A; Vandekerckhove P; Watson A; Wiseman D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000475. PubMed ID: 18425865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier placement at primary cesarean delivery and outcomes at repeat cesarean delivery.
    Edwards RK; Ingersoll M; Gerkin RD; Bodea-Braescu AV; Lin MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 123(5):923-928. PubMed ID: 24785841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary.
    Holmdahl L; Risberg B; Beck DE; Burns JW; Chegini N; diZerega GS; Ellis H
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 1997; (577):56-62. PubMed ID: 9076453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions.
    Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Blumenfeld Y; El-Sayed YY; Daniels K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22463952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Murine peritoneal injury and de novo adhesion formation caused by oxidized-regenerated cellulose (Interceed [TC7]) but not expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane).
    Haney AF; Doty E
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jan; 57(1):202-8. PubMed ID: 1730318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery: is there a personal impact?
    Herzberger EH; Alon H; Hershko-Klement A; Ganor-Paz Y; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 25877223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the reduction of postoperative adhesions by two barriers, one solution, and two pharmacologic agents in the rat uterine model.
    Yoldemir T; Sagol S; Adakan S; Oztekin K; Ozsener S; Karadadas N
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Aug; 78(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 12137871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Interest in agents for adhesion prevention after gynecologic surgery].
    Ait Menguellet S; Collinet P; Cosson M; Mariette C; Triboulet JP; Vinatier D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 17337231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
    Myers SA; Bennett TL
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane in adhesion prevention.
    Beck DE
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 1997; (577):49-55. PubMed ID: 9076452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized controlled study on the validity and safety of an absorbable adhesion barrier (InterceedĀ®) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Naito M; Ogura N; Yamanashi T; Sato T; Nakamura T; Miura H; Tsutsui A; Sakamoto Y; Tanaka R; Kumagai Y; Watanabe M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2017 Feb; 10(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 27753246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.