157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22115536)
1. The value of endocervical curettage after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Schneider P; von Orelli S; Roos M; Leo C; Fink D; Wyss P
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22115536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Lin CT; Tseng CJ; Lai CH; Hsueh S; Huang KG; Huang HJ; Chao A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 11303202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of endocervical curettage with conization in diagnosis of endocervical lesions.
Suzuki Y; Cho T; Mogami T; Yokota NR; Matsunaga T; Asai-Sato M; Hirahara F; Nojima M; Mori M; Miyagi E
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):723-728. PubMed ID: 28168772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Tseng JJ; Ho ES
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 11063658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization.
Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of disease persistence after conization for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Lin H; Chang HY; Huang CC; Changchien CC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15086731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease.
Tierney KE; Lin PS; Amezcua C; Matsuo K; Ye W; Felix JC; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):366.e1-366.e5. PubMed ID: 24370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia.
Kobak WH; Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 7824230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri.
Jain S; Tseng CJ; Horng SG; Soong YK; Pao CC
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 11426982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of invasive adenocarcinoma after conization for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
ElMasri WM; Walts AE; Chiang A; Walsh CS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):589-93. PubMed ID: 22410327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pre- and postoperative value of endocervical curettage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.
Fine BA; Feinstein GI; Sabella V
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 9784317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of endocervical curettage in the management of the patient with abnormal cervical cytologic findings.
Grainger DA; Roberts DK; Wells MM; Horbelt DV
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 156(3):625-8. PubMed ID: 3826211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
