BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22115537)

  • 1. Processing radical prostatectomies: an alternate-slice method is comparable with total embedding.
    Llanos CA; Blieden C; Vernon SE
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 22115537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: detection of positive margins and extraprostatic extension.
    Iremashvili V; Lokeshwar SD; Soloway MS; Pelaez L; Umar SA; Manoharan M; Jordá M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 23095506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features.
    Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients.
    Desai A; Wu H; Sun L; Sesterhenn IA; Mostofi FK; McLeod D; Amling C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 12496984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Sehdev AE; Pan CC; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 11381367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
    Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
    Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of whole mount processing and systematic sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: pathological outcomes and risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Herrell SD; Kordan Y; Wills ML; Shappell SB; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Cookson MS; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1334-40. PubMed ID: 20723932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods.
    Hall GS; Kramer CE; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 Apr; 16(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 1373577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distal seminal vesicle invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma does not occur in isolation of proximal seminal vesicle invasion or lymphovascular infiltration.
    Samaratunga H; Samaratunga D; Perry-Keene J; Adamson M; Yaxley J; Delahunt B
    Pathology; 2010 Jun; 42(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 20438404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Babaian RJ; Troncoso P; Bhadkamkar VA; Johnston DA
    Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(8):1414-22. PubMed ID: 11301387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Seminal vesicle invasion afer radical prostatectomy: study of risk factors for progression].
    Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):621-7. PubMed ID: 12463121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.