These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22115685)

  • 21. Cochlear implants in young children.
    Niparko JK; Blankenhorn R
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 14648819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Review: cochlear implants as a treatment of tinnitus in single-sided deafness.
    Arts RA; George EL; Stokroos RJ; Vermeire K
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 20(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 22931903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Nicholas JG; Sedey AL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):46S-58S. PubMed ID: 12612480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear implantation in osteogenesis imperfecta.
    Szilvássy J; Jóri J; Czigner J; Tóth F; Szilvássy Z; Kiss JG
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 9810462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children.
    Cosetti MK; Waltzman SB
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Feb; 45(1):155-71. PubMed ID: 22115688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.
    Geers A; Brenner C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):2S-14S. PubMed ID: 12612476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
    von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Kitterick PT; Hewitt CE; Summerfield AQ
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Feb; 95(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19948510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of auditory perception skills development in profoundly deaf children following cochlear implantation.
    Zakirullah ; Mukhtar N; Khan MI; Ahsan M; Shah SA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 19024198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review.
    Brown KD; Balkany TJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 15(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 17823546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective intraoperative method to record averaged electromyographic stapedius muscle reflexes in cochlear implant patients.
    Almqvist B; Harris S; Shallop JK
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 10905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders.
    Lenarz T
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 9810453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M; Herrmann HW
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The characteristics of hearing perception in light of the problem of rehabilitating patients who have undergone implantation].
    Lantsov AA; Petrov SM; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 9752087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Programming features of the CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant.
    Zimmerman-Phillips S; Murad C
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():17-21. PubMed ID: 10214795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.