135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22116315)
1. Inpatient and outpatient loop electrosurgery excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective analysis.
Leimbacher B; Samartzis N; Imesch P; Dedes KJ; Fink D; Canonica C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1441-5. PubMed ID: 22116315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of LOOP electrosurgical excisional procedure: case series.
Kazandi M; Oztekin K; Kazandi AC; Zekioglu O
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(5):562-3. PubMed ID: 21061801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes.
Guo HJ; Guo RX; Liu YL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23590007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Michelin MA; Merino LM; Franco CA; Murta EF
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2009; 36(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 19400411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision and subsequent hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical neoplasia.
Tae Kim Y; Sung Yoon B; Hoon Kim S; Hoon Kim J; Wook Kim J; Won Park Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):500-3. PubMed ID: 15661242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriate interval for repeat excision in women undergoing prior loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia.
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Tiyayon J; Ruengkhachorn I; Cheewakriangkrai C; Suprasert P; Pantusart A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 18159972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative complications of an outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a review of 857 consecutive cases.
Sutthichon P; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 19640171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Sexual Function after Thermal Ablation Versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2 and 3): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bahadur A; Mahamood Mm M; Heda A; Heda S; Mundhra R; Gaurav A; Bahurupi YA; Rao S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 38809642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth.
Jakobsson M; Gissler M; Paavonen J; Tapper AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 19701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
