347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22117021)
1. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems.
Chida K; Morishima Y; Inaba Y; Taura M; Ebata A; Takeda K; Shimura H; Zuguchi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22117021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Shirotori K; Shimura H; Yanagawa I; Zuguchi M; Takahashi S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21081517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of dose settings in the x-ray systems used for interventional radiology: a national survey.
Vano E; Sanchez R; Fernandez JM; Rosales F; Garcia MA; Sotil J; Hernandez J; Carrera F; Ciudad J; Soler MM; Ballester T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19052816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study.
Chida K; Saito H; Zuguchi M; Shirotori K; Kumagai S; Nakayama H; Matsubara K; Kohzuki M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1111-4. PubMed ID: 15385315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy.
Chida K; Fuda K; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 17139653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The comparison between dose rates at the interventional reference point of the angiography systems in many facilities].
Ishibashi T; Imada N; Yamashita Y; Asou H; Matsumoto Y; Inada S; Okino M; Nonaka H; Mizutani H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 22449902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two angiographic systems in paediatric interventional cardiology.
Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Aguirre D; Riquelme N; Guarda E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):250-3. PubMed ID: 25843951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clarifying and visualizing sources of staff-received scattered radiation in interventional procedures.
Chida K; Takahashi T; Ito D; Shimura H; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W900-3. PubMed ID: 22021539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.
Hill KD; Mann SD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss SF; Janssen DF; Nicholson GT; Sathanandam S; Fleming GA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E471-E477. PubMed ID: 30208245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose of cardiac IVR x-ray systems: a comparison of present and past.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Haga Y; Zuguchi M
Acta Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 70(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 26226703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occupational dose in interventional radiology procedures.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Kataoka N; Kumasaka E; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):138-41. PubMed ID: 23255753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists.
King JN; Champlin AM; Kelsey CA; Tripp DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 11756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reduction of radiation exposure for patient and investigator in interventional radiography].
Pecher G; Koenig H; Pecher S; Gosch D; Voigt P; Schulz HG
Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 9849601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
