These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22117894)

  • 21. Hybrid of Restricted and Penalized Maximum Likelihood Method for Efficient Genome-Wide Association Study.
    Ren W; Liang Z; He S; Xiao J
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33138126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sparsistency and Rates of Convergence in Large Covariance Matrix Estimation.
    Lam C; Fan J
    Ann Stat; 2009; 37(6B):4254-4278. PubMed ID: 21132082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.
    Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 19134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sequential transformation for multiple traits for estimation of (co)variance components with a derivative-free algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood.
    Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 8478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of genetic parameters.
    Mathew B; Bauer AM; Koistinen P; Reetz TC; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Oct; 109(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22805656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. L0-regularized time-varying sparse inverse covariance estimation for tracking dynamic fMRI brain networks.
    Zening Fu ; Sheng Han ; Ao Tan ; Yiheng Tu ; Zhiguo Zhang
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1496-9. PubMed ID: 26736554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for Sampling Error in Genetic Eigenvalues Using Random Matrix Theory.
    Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1271-1284. PubMed ID: 28476865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structure and stability of genetic variance-covariance matrices: A Bayesian sparse factor analysis of transcriptional variation in the three-spined stickleback.
    Siren J; Ovaskainen O; Merilä J
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(19):5099-5113. PubMed ID: 28746754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reducing computational demands of restricted maximum likelihood estimation with genomic relationship matrices.
    Meyer K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):7. PubMed ID: 36698054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating genetic covariance functions assuming a parametric correlation structure for environmental effects.
    Meyer K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(6):557-85. PubMed ID: 11742630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unconstrained procedures for the estimation of positive definite covariance matrices using restricted maximum likelihood in multibreed populations.
    Elzo MA
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Feb; 74(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 8690667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shrinkage estimation of the three-parameter logistic model.
    Battauz M; Bellio R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Nov; 74(3):591-609. PubMed ID: 33734439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
    Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison via simulation of least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimators of two variances and heritability with those of restricted maximum likelihood.
    Slanger WD; Carlson JK
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 12926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Make the most of your samples: Bayes factor estimators for high-dimensional models of sequence evolution.
    Baele G; Lemey P; Vansteelandt S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():85. PubMed ID: 23497171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unimodal regression using Bernstein-Schoenberg splines and penalties.
    Köllmann C; Bornkamp B; Ickstadt K
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):783-93. PubMed ID: 24975523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of alternative methods for estimating the precision of REML-based estimates of variance components and heritability.
    Rameez R; Jahageerdar S; Jayaraman J; Chanu TI; Bangera R; Gilmour A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Apr; 128(4):197-208. PubMed ID: 35197554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.