291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22118919)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.
Suer BT; Kocyigit ID; Kaman S; Tuz HH; Tekin U; Atil F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 24582290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures.
Alkan A; Celebi N; Ozden B; Baş B; Inal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 17651992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Danda AK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of a new technique of mandibular angle fractures: biplanar and bicortical superior proximal 3 holes and bicortical inferior plate fixation.
Turgut G; Kayali MU; Soydan AT; Gündüz O; Salman S; Oktar F; Baş L
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 18362721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical analysis of titanium miniplates used for treatment of mandibular symphyseal fractures with the finite element method.
Ji B; Wang C; Liu L; Long J; Tian W; Wang H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e21-7. PubMed ID: 20219581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.
Vineeth K; Lalitha RM; Prasad K; Ranganath K; Shwetha V; Singh J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 22809633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible.
Choi BH; Huh JY; Suh CH; Kim KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 15695047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 20655176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model.
Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of different mandibular fracture patterns on the stability of miniplate screw fixation in angle mandibular fractures.
Pektas ZO; Bayram B; Balcik C; Develi T; Uckan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 22178275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in-vitro evaluation of a novel design of miniplate for fixation of fracture segments in the transition zone of parasymphysis-body region of mandible using finite element analysis.
Datarkar A; Tayal S; Thote A; Galie M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 30527379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
