257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22119322)
1. Insights into human endometrial receptivity from transcriptomic and proteomic data.
Haouzi D; Dechaud H; Assou S; De Vos J; Hamamah S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Jan; 24(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 22119322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization alters endometrial receptivity in humans: protocol effects.
Haouzi D; Assou S; Dechanet C; Anahory T; Dechaud H; De Vos J; Hamamah S
Biol Reprod; 2010 Apr; 82(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 20042535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity.
Garrido-Gómez T; Quiñonero A; Antúnez O; Díaz-Gimeno P; Bellver J; Simón C; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1957-67. PubMed ID: 25106620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent advances in understanding endometrial receptivity: molecular basis and clinical applications.
von Grothusen C; Lalitkumar S; Boggavarapu NR; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Lalitkumar PG
Am J Reprod Immunol; 2014 Aug; 72(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 24635108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How endometrial secretomics can help in predicting implantation.
Berlanga O; Bradshaw HB; Vilella-Mitjana F; Garrido-Gómez T; Simón C
Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S271-5. PubMed ID: 21700334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Label-free proteomics uncovers energy metabolism and focal adhesion regulations responsive for endometrium receptivity.
Chen Q; Zhang A; Yu F; Gao J; Liu Y; Yu C; Zhou H; Xu C
J Proteome Res; 2015 Apr; 14(4):1831-42. PubMed ID: 25728905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results.
Garrido-Gómez T; Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Diaz-Gimeno P; Vilella F; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23312228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lipidomics as an emerging tool to predict endometrial receptivity.
Vilella F; Ramirez LB; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1100-6. PubMed ID: 23337588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defective endometrial receptivity.
Revel A
Fertil Steril; 2012 May; 97(5):1028-32. PubMed ID: 22542142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcriptomics of the human endometrium.
Díaz-Gimeno P; Ruíz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Simón C
Int J Dev Biol; 2014; 58(2-4):127-37. PubMed ID: 25023678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene expression confirms a potentially receptive endometrium identified by histology in fertile women.
Evans GE; Phillipson GT; Sin IL; Frampton CM; Kirker JA; Bigby SM; Evans JJ
Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2747-55. PubMed ID: 22740499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discovery of biomarkers of endometrial receptivity through a minimally invasive approach: a validation study with implications for assisted reproduction.
Chan C; Virtanen C; Winegarden NA; Colgan TJ; Brown TJ; Greenblatt EM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):810-7. PubMed ID: 23725802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility.
Altmäe S; Martínez-Conejero JA; Salumets A; Simón C; Horcajadas JA; Stavreus-Evers A
Mol Hum Reprod; 2010 Mar; 16(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 19933690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proteomics of the human endometrium and uterine fluid: a pathway to biomarker discovery.
Salamonsen LA; Edgell T; Rombauts LJ; Stephens AN; Robertson DM; Rainczuk A; Nie G; Hannan NJ
Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1086-92. PubMed ID: 23043689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Craciunas L; Gallos I; Chu J; Bourne T; Quenby S; Brosens JJ; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Mar; 25(2):202-223. PubMed ID: 30624659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Embryo implantation: biology, evaluation, and enhancement.
Koot YE; Macklon NS
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 23787799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated.
Domínguez F; Garrido-Gómez T; López JA; Camafeita E; Quiñonero A; Pellicer A; Simón C
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2607-17. PubMed ID: 19556289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium.
Kalma Y; Granot I; Gnainsky Y; Or Y; Czernobilsky B; Dekel N; Barash A
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1042-9, 1049.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18355812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proteomic Insights into Endometrial Receptivity and Embryo-Endometrial Epithelium Interaction for Implantation Reveal Critical Determinants of Fertility.
Evans J; Hutchison J; Salamonsen LA; Greening DW
Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 20(1):e1900250. PubMed ID: 31825151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Window of implantation transcriptomic stratification reveals different endometrial subsignatures associated with live birth and biochemical pregnancy.
Díaz-Gimeno P; Ruiz-Alonso M; Sebastian-Leon P; Pellicer A; Valbuena D; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2017 Oct; 108(4):703-710.e3. PubMed ID: 28863933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
