These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22119547)

  • 21. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
    Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contraction stress, elastic modulus, and degree of conversion of three flowable composites.
    Cadenaro M; Codan B; Navarra CO; Marchesi G; Turco G; Di Lenarda R; Breschi L
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Jun; 119(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21564319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flowable composites: do we really need them?
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 18254554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Endo T; Kanehira M; Koottathape N; Komatsu M; Balkenhol M
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):264-70. PubMed ID: 22165452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conversion degree, microhardness, microleakage and fluoride release of different fissure sealants.
    Kuşgöz A; Tüzüner T; Ulker M; Kemer B; Saray O
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Nov; 3(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 20826365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials.
    Dukić W; Dukić OL; Milardović S
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 19408619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage.
    Tjandrawinata R; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15853111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials.
    Stavridakis MM; Dietschi D; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 15765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up.
    Oba AA; Sönmez IŞ; Ercan E; Dülgergil T
    Med Princ Pract; 2012; 21(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 22156663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taneja S; Singh A
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(4):50-55. PubMed ID: 32597778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two methods for measuring the polymerization characteristics of flowable resin composites.
    Yamamoto A; Miyazaki M; Rikuta A; Kurokawa H; Takamizawa T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):792-8. PubMed ID: 16890986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why are flowable resin-based composites so popular?
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Dec; 144(12):1406-8. PubMed ID: 24282271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Filler morphology of resin-based low-viscosity materials and surface properties after several photoactivation times.
    Borges BC; Bezerra GV; Mesquita Jde A; Silva TR; Alves-Júnior C; Pinheiro IV; Braz R; Montes MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Jan; 71(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 22283452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Yashar M; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 12644801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bonded amalgam sealants and adhesive resin sealants: five-year clinical results.
    Staninec M; Artiga N; Gansky SA; Marshall GW; Eakle S
    Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 15130073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: a comparative laboratory study.
    Eliades A; Birpou E; Eliades T; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):752-62. PubMed ID: 23669197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.