These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22120767)

  • 1. Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.
    Mehta S; Quittnat Pelletier F; Brown M; Ethier C; Wells D; Burry L; MacDonald R
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Jan; 38(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).
    Burns KE; Rizvi L; Smith OM; Lee Y; Lee J; Wang M; Brown M; Parker M; Premji A; Leung D; Hammond Mobilio M; Gotlib-Conn L; Nisenbaum R; Santos M; Li Y; Mehta S
    Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 41(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 25491659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).
    Burns KE; Zubrinich C; Tan W; Raptis S; Xiong W; Smith O; McDonald E; Marshall JC; Saginur R; Heslegrave R; Rubenfeld G; Cook DJ;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge B; Freeman BD
    Chest; 2012 Dec; 142(6):1433-1439. PubMed ID: 22677349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Deferred Consent Model in a Prospective Observational Study Evaluating Myocardial Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Honarmand K; Belley-Cote EP; Ulic D; Khalifa A; Gibson A; McClure G; Savija N; Alshamsi F; D'Aragon F; Rochwerg B; Duan EH; Karachi T; Lamontagne F; Devereaux PJ; Whitlock RP; Cook DJ
    J Intensive Care Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):475-480. PubMed ID: 29991343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.
    Krutsinger DC; O'Leary KL; Ellenberg SS; Cotner CE; Halpern SD; Courtright KR
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Sep; 17(9):1117-1125. PubMed ID: 32441987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.
    Paddock K; Woolfall K; Kearney A; Pattison N; Frith L; Gamble C; Welters I; Trinder J; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e066149. PubMed ID: 36375987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bibas L; Peretz-Larochelle M; Adhikari NK; Goldfarb MJ; Luk A; Englesakis M; Detsky ME; Lawler PR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197229. PubMed ID: 31322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.
    Parker MJ; de Laat S; Schwartz L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012931. PubMed ID: 27625066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Freeman BD
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2014 Apr; 30(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24211047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.
    Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients.
    Barrett KA; Ferguson ND; Athaide V; Cook DJ; Friedrich JO; McDonald E; Pinto R; Smith OM; Stevenson J; Scales DC
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1616-23. PubMed ID: 22825282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.
    Crawshaw J; Presseau J; van Allen Z; Pinheiro Carvalho L; Jordison K; English S; Fergusson DA; Lauzier F; Turgeon AF; Sarti AJ; Martin C; D'Aragon F; Li AH; Knoll G; Ball I; Brehaut J; Burns KEA; Fortin MC; Weiss M; Meade M; Marsolais P; Shemie S; Zaabat S; Dhanani S; Kitto SC; Chassé M;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e034594. PubMed ID: 31874899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers.
    Van Scoy LJ; Day AG; Howard M; Sudore R; Heyland DK
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2019 May; 57(5):980-988.e9. PubMed ID: 30684633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public perception of participation in low-risk clinical trials in critical care using waived consent: a Canadian national survey.
    Opgenorth D; Duquette DJ; Tyre L; Auld R; Crowder K; Gilchrist P; Young PJ; Bagshaw SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 71(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 38459367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-designing and pilot testing an infographic to support patients/families through the REMAP-CAP consent process: a mixed-methods study protocol.
    O'Grady HK; Bhimani Z; Dalziel S; Dolanjski B; Sandhu G; Santos M; Smith K; Murthy S; Marshall JC; Kho ME
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2023 Apr; 9(1):58. PubMed ID: 37055859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate.
    Dorantes DM; Tait AR; Naughton NN
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Aug; 91(2):369-73. PubMed ID: 10910850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.
    Gobat NH; Gal M; Francis NA; Hood K; Watkins A; Turner J; Moore R; Webb SA; Butler CC; Nichol A
    Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring determinants of surrogate decision-maker confidence: an example from the ICU.
    Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge BR; LeBlanc JL; Mahmood RS; Roman AM; Freeman BD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Oct; 9(4):76-85. PubMed ID: 25747298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.