These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22121170)

  • 1. Dutch research community is shocked by cases of scientific misconduct.
    Sheldon T
    BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7690. PubMed ID: 22121170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. WHO to probe claims that Dutch scientists restricted access to novel coronavirus.
    Dyer C; Dyer O
    BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f3464. PubMed ID: 23714279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
    Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Scientific misconduct in Norwegian medical research].
    Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1795-6. PubMed ID: 17599131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
    Berg AO
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research misconduct--an indictment and possible solution.
    Uffelmann H
    Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):13-22. PubMed ID: 11902180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?
    Abdi S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2023 Feb; 30(2):109-131. PubMed ID: 34455868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues in research: scientific misconduct and fraud.
    Fry ST
    Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(6):296. PubMed ID: 2235540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
    De Broe ME
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Universities against scientific misconduct].
    Benestad HB
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Feb; 127(3):322. PubMed ID: 17279120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
    Normile D
    Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case of scientific misconduct.
    O'Malley P
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 19710573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Unclear boundaries for scientific misconduct. Difficult to detect false and manipulated data].
    Viidik A
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Sep 2-8; 106(36):2222-3. PubMed ID: 19817181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.
    Knoll E
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.