118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22122354)
21. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
Denys S; Hofmann M; Luts H; Guérin C; Keymeulen A; Van Hoeck K; van Wieringen A; Hoppenbrouwers K; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children.
Neumann K; Baumeister N; Baumann U; Sick U; Euler HA; Weissgerber T
Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 22208668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise.
Houben R; Koopman J; Luts H; Wagener KC; van Wieringen A; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):760-3. PubMed ID: 24959915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.
Zokoll MA; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Wagener KC; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23800814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss.
Vlaming MS; MacKinnon RC; Jansen M; Moore DR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):667-79. PubMed ID: 25127323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The development and evaluation of the Finnish digit triplet test.
Willberg T; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Aarnisalo AA; Löppönen H; Kollmeier B; Dietz A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 136(10):1035-40. PubMed ID: 27121373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
