These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22122354)

  • 41. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Analysis of disyllabic mandarin speech test results of normal hearing persons with different ages].
    Wang Y; Zhang H; Tong J; Guo J; Zheng Z; Wu W; Chen J; Li Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(7):312-5. PubMed ID: 22737873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of white noise on Callsign Acquisition Test and Modified Rhyme Test scores.
    Blue-Terry M; Letowski T
    Ergonomics; 2011 Feb; 54(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21294011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. FIST: a French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Luts H; Boon E; Wable J; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):373-4. PubMed ID: 18569114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of lexical-access ability and vocabulary knowledge on measures of speech recognition in noise.
    Kaandorp MW; De Groot AM; Festen JM; Smits C; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 26609557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of the Mandarin Digit-in-Noise Test and Examination of the Effect of the Number of Digits Used in the Test.
    Wang S; Wong LLN
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 37990396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wagener KC; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 16562561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The development and validation of the Closed-set Mandarin Sentence (CMS) test.
    Tao DD; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Yu YF
    Speech Commun; 2017 Sep; 92():125-131. PubMed ID: 29200541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials.
    Brännström KJ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 22023486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.
    Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Sternasty K; Moore DR
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 32903129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Developing a speech intelligibility test based on measuring speech reception thresholds in noise for English and Finnish.
    Vainio M; Suni A; Jarveläinen H; Järvikivi J; Mattila VV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1742-50. PubMed ID: 16240832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The Oldenburg children's rhyme test during speech simulating noise disturbance (Regensburg variant). Modification of the test and normal values for the ages 7-10 years].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 14647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Selection of test-setup parameters to target specific signal-to-noise regions in speech-on-speech intelligibility testing.
    Rønne FM; Laugesen S; Jensen NS
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(8):559-567. PubMed ID: 28290709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Anema PC; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 3558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reference data for a quick speech-in-noise hearing test in the French language.
    Bestel J; Pressnitzer D; Robier M; Rembaud F; Renard C; Leclercq F; Vincent C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38498993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnosing and Screening in a Minority Language: A Validation Study.
    Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):369-372. PubMed ID: 29049620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.