BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212288)

  • 1. Perception of intraphonemic differences by phoneticians, musicians, and inexperienced listeners.
    Hillenbrand J; Canter GJ; Smith BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):655-62. PubMed ID: 2212288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of tone training on Cantonese tone-word learning.
    Cooper A; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL133-9. PubMed ID: 23927215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception.
    Bidelman GM; Walker BS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 45(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28112440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues.
    Francis AL; Baldwin K; Nusbaum HC
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Nov; 62(8):1668-80. PubMed ID: 11140187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The boundaries of auditory perception for within-word syllable segregation in untrained and trained adult listeners.
    Brown T; Murray E; McCabe P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2018; 32(11):979-996. PubMed ID: 29672170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetically trained and untrained adults' transcription of place of articulation for intervocalic lingual stops with intermediate acoustic cues.
    Mayo C; Gibbon F; Clark RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 23275392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training new, nonnative speech contrasts: a comparison of the prototype and perceptual fading techniques.
    Jamieson DG; Morosan DE
    Can J Psychol; 1989 Mar; 43(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 2819599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of middorsum palatal stops from the speech of three children with repaired cleft palate.
    Santelmann L; Sussman J; Chapman K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 May; 36(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 10342611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the "enigma" of musicians with dyslexia: Auditory sequencing and speech abilities.
    Zuk J; Bishop-Liebler P; Ozernov-Palchik O; Moore E; Overy K; Welch G; Gaab N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 28383990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K; Ralston JV
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):349-66. PubMed ID: 11999859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thai Rate-Varied Vowel Length Perception and the Impact of Musical Experience.
    Cooper A; Wang Y; Ashley R
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):65-84. PubMed ID: 28326992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in a Musician's Advantage for Speech-in-Speech Perception Based on Age and Task.
    Cohn M; Barreda S; Zellou G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):545-564. PubMed ID: 36729698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory coding, cues, and coherence in phonetic perception.
    Sawusch JR; Gagnon DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):635-52. PubMed ID: 7790838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Commun Disord; 1983 May; 16(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 6875033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.