These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212290)

  • 21. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking.
    Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):392-402. PubMed ID: 22779486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of adult Ineraid and Nucleus cochlear implant patients after 3.5 years of use.
    Tyler RS; Lowder MW; Parkinson AJ; Woodworth GG; Gantz BJ
    Audiology; 1995; 34(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 8561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 3624639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Soli S; Dankowski K; Smith LM; McCandless G; Parkin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2074-9. PubMed ID: 2269723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Moore BC; McCabe BF
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 3624640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Tye-Murray N; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Saudan O; Boex C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2048-54. PubMed ID: 7963020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The mechanism of speech perception in patients with a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Sakakihara J
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1994 Aug; 19(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 7994894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Demorest ME; Fourakis MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3766-82. PubMed ID: 9193063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition in analog multichannel cochlear prostheses: initial experiments in controlling classifications.
    White MW; Ochs MT; Merzenich MM; Schubert ED
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Oct; 37(10):1002-10. PubMed ID: 2249858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Vandali AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3367-71. PubMed ID: 1619114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.