These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: effects of modulation depth and signal position. Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1276-84. PubMed ID: 2708670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of frequency modulation (FM) in the presence of a second FM tone. Wilson AS; Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1333-8. PubMed ID: 2229668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers. Buss E; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):1905-8. PubMed ID: 19062829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels. Stillman JA; Irwin RJ Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers. Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. Borrill SJ; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners. Hall JW; Grose JH; Moore BC J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation. Eddins DA; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Dec; 96(6):3432-42. PubMed ID: 7814760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release. Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 19894826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis. Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 3958319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1944-56. PubMed ID: 3429732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. Ewert SD; Verhey JL; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2921-31. PubMed ID: 12509013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comodulation masking release as a function of level. Moore BC; Shailer MJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modulation discrimination interference and comodulation masking release as a function of the number and spectral placement of narrow-band noise modulators. Moore BC; Jorasz U J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2373-81. PubMed ID: 8865644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components. Carlyon RP J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):949-61. PubMed ID: 8132909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]